Control: tags -1 patch
Hi all,
* Jindřich Makovička [2018-03-08 19:46 +]:
> There is a fix in upstream master.
>
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/8391
I managed to build Debian's 238-1 with the attached patch included.
I hereby confirm that those packages fix
* Jindřich Makovička [2018-03-08 19:46 +]:
> There is a fix in upstream master.
>
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/8391
Patched Debian sources and tried to build packages:
OK: 239
FAIL: 1
SKIP: 15
TIMEOUT:0
debian/rules:281: recipe for
* Diederik de Haas [2018-03-08 20:29 +0100]:
> Package: systemd
> Followup-For: Bug #892360
>
> Wanting to let you know that I had no problem on my PC (from which I'm
> reporting) and also not on my laptop.
>
> I did not have to specify any (systemd related) kernel
* Elimar Riesebieter <riese...@lxtec.de> [2018-03-08 19:13 +0100]:
[...]
> ATM I am building a x86 with CONFIG_CGROUP_CPUACCT=not set. Let's
> wait and see
"CONFIG_CGROUP_CPUACCT is not set" gives the same error as shown in
the picture of my initial bug report.
The pr
* Eric Valette <eric.vale...@free.fr> [2018-03-08 19:08 +0100]:
> On 3/8/18 7:03 PM, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > * Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> [2018-03-08 18:54 +0100]:
> >
> > [...]
> > > Can you check your custom kernel config, specifically if
&
* Michael Biebl [2018-03-08 18:54 +0100]:
[...]
> Can you check your custom kernel config, specifically if
> CONFIG_CGROUP_CPUACCT=y
I do have CONFIG_CGROUP_CPUACCT=y
Well, but why does 237 works with the very same kernel?
Elimar
--
Numeric stability is probably not all
* Michael Biebl [2018-03-08 17:09 +0100]:
> Am 08.03.2018 um 17:05 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> > Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> >
> > Am 08.03.2018 um 16:23 schrieb valette:
> >
[...]
> Could you check if
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/8387
> looks related
>
> I.e.
* Michael Biebl [2018-03-08 17:05 +0100]:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Am 08.03.2018 um 16:23 schrieb valette:
>
> > Kernel: Linux 4.14.23 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
>
> Is this also happening with a Debian provided kernel?
> I see both you and Elimar use a custom
Control: reassign -1 nis
Control: retitle -1 "nscd should be a Depends"
* Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> [2017-10-16 11:27 +0200]:
> Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/7074
>
> Am 15.10.2017 um 10:55 schrieb Elimar Riesebieter:
> &g
* Elimar Riesebieter <riese...@lxtec.de> [2017-10-17 18:24 +0200]:
> * Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> [2017-10-17 16:38 +0200]:
>
> > Am 15.10.2017 um 11:15 schrieb Elimar Riesebieter:
> > > * Elimar Riesebieter <riese...@lxtec.de> [2017-10-15 10:55
* Elimar Riesebieter <riese...@lxtec.de> [2017-10-15 10:55 +0200]:
> Package: systemd
> Version: 235-2
> Severity: normal
>
> Login as a NIS user journalctl tells:
>
> systemd-logind[666]: do_ypcall: clnt_call: RPC: Unable to send; errno =
> Operation not permitt
* 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson [2016-11-06 06:11 +0800]:
> severity 843251 grave
> thanks
> Yes i386.
> And you know what?
> the user cannot ever boot his computer ever again, even from grub
> menus' "(recovery mode)".
>
> ER> I can confirm this behaviour. Be care to reboot:
> ER> If
Package: libpam-systemd
Version: 208-6
Severity: normal
Please add an alternate dependency on sysvinit-core and respective on upstart,
though.
Elimar
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (100, 'experimental')
Architecture:
* Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org [2014-07-26 13:25 +0200]:
Am 26.07.2014 10:08, schrieb Elimar Riesebieter:
Package: systemd
Version: 208-6
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the
past)
Using pbuilder updated today. Build stops
* Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org [2014-07-17 17:25 +0200]:
Am 17.07.2014 16:20, schrieb Elimar Riesebieter:
[...]
I don't see the intention?
You should read the changelog then. Not understanding the intentions is
not a justification for reopening a bug report which has been closed by
its
15 matches
Mail list logo