Michael Biebl [2016-12-31 9:29 +0100]:
> Your analysis seems to be correct. Until systemd is fixed, you should
> not use RestrictAddressFamilies=
>
> I'm not sure whether we will get v233 for stretch and if backporting
> those upstream fixes for v232 is feasible.
I do intend to backport the fix
On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 13:49:34 +0100
Florian Schlichting wrote:
> > > Your analysis seems to be correct. Until systemd is fixed, you
> > > should not use RestrictAddressFamilies=
> > >
> > > I'm not sure whether we will get v233 for stretch and if
> > > backporting those upstream fixes for v232 is
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 03:32:42PM +0300, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
> Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> > Your analysis seems to be correct. Until systemd is fixed, you should
> > not use RestrictAddressFamilies=
> >
> > I'm not sure whether we will get v233 for stretch and if backporting
> > those ups
On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 09:29:18 +0100
Michael Biebl wrote:
Hi, Michael!
Thanks for cooperating!
> > After upgrading an i686 machine running mpd from Jessie to Stretch,
> > I noticed mpd won't start -- exiting with return code 1 early at
> > startup:
[...]
> > Finally this spotted the problem which
Am 30.12.2016 um 08:26 schrieb Konstantin Khomoutov:
> Package: mpd
> Version: 0.19.21-1
> Severity: important
>
> Hi!
>
> After upgrading an i686 machine running mpd from Jessie to Stretch,
> I noticed mpd won't start -- exiting with return code 1 early at
> startup:
>
> | Dec 30 10:16:52 jukeb
