Processed: [bts-link] source package systemd

2015-07-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 #
 # bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd
 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
 #
 user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org (was 
bts-link-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org).
 # remote status report for #791897 (http://bugs.debian.org/791897)
 # Bug title: systemd: incorrect x bit for group on .journal log files after 
 setting Storage=persistent
 #  * https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/534
 #  * remote status changed: open - closed
 #  * closed upstream
 tags 791897 + fixed-upstream
Bug #791897 [systemd] systemd: incorrect x bit for group on .journal log files 
after setting Storage=persistent
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
 usertags 791897 - status-open
Usertags were: status-open.
Usertags are now: .
 usertags 791897 + status-closed
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-closed.
 # remote status report for #792090 (http://bugs.debian.org/792090)
 # Bug title: journalctl: Error was encountered while opening journal files: 
 Invalid argument
 #  * https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/487
 #  * remote status changed: open - closed
 #  * closed upstream
 tags 792090 + fixed-upstream
Bug #792090 [systemd] journalctl: Error was encountered while opening journal 
files: Invalid argument
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
 usertags 792090 - status-open
Usertags were: status-open.
Usertags are now: .
 usertags 792090 + status-closed
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-closed.
 # remote status report for #792761 (http://bugs.debian.org/792761)
 # Bug title: UX issue, handling of endless shutdown loops
 #  * https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/633
 #  * remote status changed: (?) - open
 usertags 792761 + status-open
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-open.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
791897: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791897
792090: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792090
792761: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792761
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers


Bug#792761: UX issue, handling of endless shutdown loops

2015-07-27 Thread Eduard Bloch
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:13:25 -0300 Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote:

  I'm afraid 2 is really an upstream issue and not an integration issue.
  Could you please file that bug upstream?
 
  Maybe... I will give it a try tonight. However I am sceptical regarding
  productive communication with upstream.
 
 Great, let us know when you have filed a bug upstream.

https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/633^

  Says that it cannot find an id. Checked:
 
  $ sudo journalctl --list-boots
  -1 39f59f8ebdd644f39aeb46b67eef9bff Sa 2015-07-18 09:12:05 CEST—Mo 
  2015-07-20 08
   0 39f59f8ebdd644f39aeb46b67eef9bff Mo 2015-07-20 08:39:43 CEST—Mo 
  2015-07-20 08
 
  No idea what happened to the logs.
 
 Do you have persistent logging enabled? I think you do not. Please
 follow the instructions of the README.Debian if you want to enable it.

Done, waiting for repro situation...

Regards,
Eduard.

-- 
xTs rpm? Waren das nicht verwunschene debs?

___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers


[bts-link] source package systemd

2015-07-27 Thread bts-link-upstream
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#

user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org

# remote status report for #791897 (http://bugs.debian.org/791897)
# Bug title: systemd: incorrect x bit for group on .journal log files after 
setting Storage=persistent
#  * https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/534
#  * remote status changed: open - closed
#  * closed upstream
tags 791897 + fixed-upstream
usertags 791897 - status-open
usertags 791897 + status-closed

# remote status report for #792090 (http://bugs.debian.org/792090)
# Bug title: journalctl: Error was encountered while opening journal files: 
Invalid argument
#  * https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/487
#  * remote status changed: open - closed
#  * closed upstream
tags 792090 + fixed-upstream
usertags 792090 - status-open
usertags 792090 + status-closed

# remote status report for #792761 (http://bugs.debian.org/792761)
# Bug title: UX issue, handling of endless shutdown loops
#  * https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/633
#  * remote status changed: (?) - open
usertags 792761 + status-open

thanks

___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers


Processed: Re: Bug#793814: systemd-logind: Logins via ssh and su are delayed by 25 seconds

2015-07-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 forcemerge 770135 793814
Bug #770135 [systemd] systemd: ssh logins considerably delayed (until PAM 
timeout) when systemd is upgraded but the system not rebooted
Bug #793814 [systemd] systemd-logind: Logins via ssh and su are delayed by 25 
seconds
Severity set to 'normal' from 'important'
Marked as found in versions systemd/215-6.
Bug #770135 [systemd] systemd: ssh logins considerably delayed (until PAM 
timeout) when systemd is upgraded but the system not rebooted
Marked as found in versions systemd/215-17+deb8u1.
Merged 770135 793814
 found 770135 222-2
Bug #770135 [systemd] systemd: ssh logins considerably delayed (until PAM 
timeout) when systemd is upgraded but the system not rebooted
Bug #793814 [systemd] systemd-logind: Logins via ssh and su are delayed by 25 
seconds
Marked as found in versions systemd/222-2.
Marked as found in versions systemd/222-2.

-- 
770135: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770135
793814: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793814
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers


Bug#770135: Bug#793814: systemd-logind: Logins via ssh and su are delayed by 25 seconds

2015-07-27 Thread Felipe Sateler
Control: forcemerge 770135 793814
Control: found 770135 222-2

Hi Steven,

On 27 July 2015 at 15:05, Steven Monai smo...@sd57.bc.ca wrote:
 Dear Maintainer,

 There is an issue with the systemd-logind daemon that appears to be
 triggered whenever the dbus daemon is restarted.

 Specifically, after a recent 'apt-get upgrade' to install a security
 update (of libexpat1, if that matters), I restarted the 'dbus' daemon,
 since 'needrestart' had flagged it as one of the daemons requiring a
 restart.

 After that, I noticed that logins via ssh and 'su -' were being
 delayed by about 25 seconds. Here is what I see in /var/log/syslog
 after every login attempt:

 Jul 27 09:27:59 ldb dbus[27174]: [system] Activating via systemd: service 
 name='org.freedesktop.login1' unit='dbus-org.freedesktop.login1.service'
 Jul 27 09:28:24 ldb dbus[27174]: [system] Failed to activate service 
 'org.freedesktop.login1': timed out

 Notice the 25-second timespan between log entries.

 The problem goes away after I restart the systemd-logind daemon.

 To reliably trigger the problem on my system (it is a headless
 server, no Xorg installed), I merely need to do this:

 systemctl restart dbus

 All subsequent logins or su's then experience a 25 second delay
 before proceeding successfully. The following command then returns
 login processing to normal, without the delay:

 systemctl restart systemd-logind


This was already reported as #770135 , but the dbus connection was not
mentioned before. I can confirm the same behavior on systemd 222-2
(inside an nspawn container).

-- 

Saludos,
Felipe Sateler

___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers


Re: timedatectl Should Not be Enabled by Default: Privacy/Anonymity risks

2015-07-27 Thread intrigeri
Hi,

bancfc wrote (26 Jul 2015 18:19:59 GMT) :
 The research comes from WhonixOS a privacy centric distro like TAILS.

For the record, this does not imply any position from Tails regarding
this topic: the Tails threat model generally does not apply as-is
to Debian.

Also, it would be good to describe what exact threat model you see
timedatectl as a security/privacy problem, so Debian has the data to evaluate
if/how its default installation settings behave in that context:
looking at one single potential issue in isolation does not make much
sense to me, if there are potentially dozens of other ways for an
attacker to do what they want. Thanks in advance!

To end with, I'm wondering whether this email is really
about timesyncd.

Cheers,
-- 
intrigeri

___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers


Re: Bug#792418: Wrong illegal-runtime-test-name for comma separated Tests: in debian/tests/control

2015-07-27 Thread Martin Pitt
Hey Niels,

sorry for the delay, I was on holiday.

Niels Thykier [2015-07-15  7:20 +0200]:
 If you are planning on using comma as the canonical separator, please
 consider also updating the examples in your documentation.  E.g. your
 [1] still says:
 
 
 The source package provides a test metadata file debian/tests/control.
 This is a file containing zero or more RFC822-style stanzas, along these
 lines:
 
 Tests: fred bill bongo
 Restrictions: needs-root breaks-testbed
 

Thanks for pointing out! Fixed in git now:

  http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/autopkgtest/autopkgtest.git/commit/?id=5521c

 On a related note, do you want us to recommend users to use comma
 instead of whitespace (by warning about a pure whitespace separator)?

Using whitespace only is still legitimate syntax and I don't want to
break that for the time being due to backwards compat. Likewise I
wouldn't want to introduce potentially hundreds of lintian warnings
just for that yet. So a lintian warning seems to be too strong to me,
at least for the time being.

Thanks!

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)

___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers