]] Christoph Anton Mitterer
> On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 16:46 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>
> > > Sure... but that's how it is... I guess it's absolutely sure that there
> > > will always be software, which doesn't use e.g. NM (and given the issues
> > > I have with NM, I'm actually happy about th
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 16:46 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> What's the deal about your use of ellipsises all the time? It looks
> really weird and I'm not sure what you're trying to communicate by using
> them.
Uhm, guess I'm using that too much. It's just some kind of a break/pause
- as you seem
Am 25.05.2014 23:38, schrieb Dwayne Litzenberger:
> Package: systemd
> Version: 204-10
> Followup-For: Bug #674755
> Control: affects -1 + ubuntu-dev-tools
>
> This also breaks the mk-sbuild(1) tool from the ubuntu-dev-tools
> package.
>
Please file a bug against ubuntu-dev-tools to use /dev/sh
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + ubuntu-dev-tools
Bug #674755 [systemd] systemd: tmpfs inconsistencies (/run/lock, /run/shm, /tmp)
Added indication that 674755 affects ubuntu-dev-tools
--
674755: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674755
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contac
Hi.
Shouldn't have this some much higher severity? The modules might be
required for booting the system... with systemd the long standing way of
how /etc/modules worked breaks and it's also still documented as it
should work.
Also I don't agree with upstream and what Michael wrote in #15:
Not hav
Package: systemd
Version: 208-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
When loging out, the sd-pam and systemd --user processes are still
running and are never killed.
The logind session is properly unregistered (if all the user processes
have exited properly) though.
Cheers,
Laurent Bigonville
-- Package-spec
Hi Martin-Éric,
Martin-Éric Racine writes:
> The output from init.d scripts is printed to console 3 consecutive times
> when systemd is pid 1.
Can you provide a screenshot please? I don’t have that.
--
Best regards,
Michael
___
Pkg-systemd-maintaine
