Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:13:25 -0300 Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote:
I'm afraid 2 is really an upstream issue and not an integration issue.
Could you please file that bug upstream?
Maybe... I will give it a try tonight. However I am sceptical regarding
productive communication
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #791897 (http://bugs.debian.org/791897)
# Bug title: systemd: incorrect x bit for
Processing control commands:
forcemerge 770135 793814
Bug #770135 [systemd] systemd: ssh logins considerably delayed (until PAM
timeout) when systemd is upgraded but the system not rebooted
Bug #793814 [systemd] systemd-logind: Logins via ssh and su are delayed by 25
seconds
Severity set to
Control: forcemerge 770135 793814
Control: found 770135 222-2
Hi Steven,
On 27 July 2015 at 15:05, Steven Monai smo...@sd57.bc.ca wrote:
Dear Maintainer,
There is an issue with the systemd-logind daemon that appears to be
triggered whenever the dbus daemon is restarted.
Specifically, after
Hi,
bancfc wrote (26 Jul 2015 18:19:59 GMT) :
The research comes from WhonixOS a privacy centric distro like TAILS.
For the record, this does not imply any position from Tails regarding
this topic: the Tails threat model generally does not apply as-is
to Debian.
Also, it would be good to
Hey Niels,
sorry for the delay, I was on holiday.
Niels Thykier [2015-07-15 7:20 +0200]:
If you are planning on using comma as the canonical separator, please
consider also updating the examples in your documentation. E.g. your
[1] still says:
The source package provides a test