Processed: [bts-link] source package systemd

2015-07-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # # bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org

Bug#792761: UX issue, handling of endless shutdown loops

2015-07-27 Thread Eduard Bloch
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:13:25 -0300 Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: I'm afraid 2 is really an upstream issue and not an integration issue. Could you please file that bug upstream? Maybe... I will give it a try tonight. However I am sceptical regarding productive communication

[bts-link] source package systemd

2015-07-27 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #791897 (http://bugs.debian.org/791897) # Bug title: systemd: incorrect x bit for

Processed: Re: Bug#793814: systemd-logind: Logins via ssh and su are delayed by 25 seconds

2015-07-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: forcemerge 770135 793814 Bug #770135 [systemd] systemd: ssh logins considerably delayed (until PAM timeout) when systemd is upgraded but the system not rebooted Bug #793814 [systemd] systemd-logind: Logins via ssh and su are delayed by 25 seconds Severity set to

Bug#770135: Bug#793814: systemd-logind: Logins via ssh and su are delayed by 25 seconds

2015-07-27 Thread Felipe Sateler
Control: forcemerge 770135 793814 Control: found 770135 222-2 Hi Steven, On 27 July 2015 at 15:05, Steven Monai smo...@sd57.bc.ca wrote: Dear Maintainer, There is an issue with the systemd-logind daemon that appears to be triggered whenever the dbus daemon is restarted. Specifically, after

Re: timedatectl Should Not be Enabled by Default: Privacy/Anonymity risks

2015-07-27 Thread intrigeri
Hi, bancfc wrote (26 Jul 2015 18:19:59 GMT) : The research comes from WhonixOS a privacy centric distro like TAILS. For the record, this does not imply any position from Tails regarding this topic: the Tails threat model generally does not apply as-is to Debian. Also, it would be good to

Re: Bug#792418: Wrong illegal-runtime-test-name for comma separated Tests: in debian/tests/control

2015-07-27 Thread Martin Pitt
Hey Niels, sorry for the delay, I was on holiday. Niels Thykier [2015-07-15 7:20 +0200]: If you are planning on using comma as the canonical separator, please consider also updating the examples in your documentation. E.g. your [1] still says: The source package provides a test