Bug#766228: systemd does not care /etc/default/grub

Hello all. Adding some information below... On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 08:42:27PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 30.01.2016 um 20:41 schrieb Michael Biebl: > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 23:30:24 + Philipp Hug wrote: > >> Hi Philippe, > >> > >> By

Bug#813372: systemd: does not boot

Control: tag -1 moreinfo Control: retitle -1 fails to mount rootfs on mmcblk1p5 during boot Hello Michal, Michal Suchanek [2016-02-01 13:36 +0100]: > Attaching the output of journalctl -xb from the recovery shell on failed boot. This is the culprit: Feb 01 13:18:41 chromebook systemd[1]:

Processed: Re: Bug#813372: systemd: does not boot

Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #813372 [systemd] systemd: does not boot Added tag(s) moreinfo. > retitle -1 fails to mount rootfs on mmcblk1p5 during boot Bug #813372 [systemd] systemd: does not boot Changed Bug title to 'fails to mount rootfs on mmcblk1p5 during boot' from

Bug#813372: systemd: does not boot

On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 14:06 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > This is the culprit: > > Feb 01 13:18:41 chromebook systemd[1]: dev-mmcblk1p5.mount: Mount > process exited, code=exited status=32 > Feb 01 13:18:41 chromebook systemd[1]: Failed to mount > /dev/mmcblk1p5. > > Your fstab has > >   /

Re: broken mount behaviour on jessie

Hi, On Mon, 01 Feb 2016, Brian May wrote: > I see two patches here - one patch applies easy enough to schroot - > 1.6-schroot-mount-make-bind-mounts-private.patch > > I am not sure what the > master-libexec-mount-make-bind-mounts-private.patch is for, it seems to > patch files not in schroot but

[bts-link] source package systemd

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #802780 (http://bugs.debian.org/802780) # Bug title: systemd: systemctl 227 fails in

Re: broken mount behaviour on jessie

On Mon, 01 Feb 2016, Brian May wrote: > Michael Biebl writes: > > > Have you tried the patch in > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786566 > > I see two patches here - one patch applies easy enough to schroot - >

Bug#813141: chroot upgrade from jessie to stretch disables predictable network interface names

reassign 813141 udev thanks # we enabled net.ifnames in 220-7 by default; don't change iface names in # virtualized envs (where 75-persistent-net-generator.rules didn't work) I think we need a more precise check for affected systems rather than the lack of existance of

Processed: chroot upgrade from jessie to stretch disables predictable network interface names

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 813141 udev Bug #813141 [systemd] chroot upgrade from jessie to stretch disables predictable network interface names Bug reassigned from package 'systemd' to 'udev'. No longer marked as found in versions systemd/228-4. Ignoring request

Re: broken mount behaviour on jessie

Michael Biebl writes: > Have you tried the patch in > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786566 I see two patches here - one patch applies easy enough to schroot - 1.6-schroot-mount-make-bind-mounts-private.patch I am not sure what the

Bug#812215: consider spliting systemd-tmpfiles into separate package

On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 04:47:34PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016, at 16:41, Josh Triplett wrote: > > Implementing the various operation letters makes up half the problem. > > The other half involves handling the various tmpfiles.d directories and > > the precedence between them.

Bug#812215: consider spliting systemd-tmpfiles into separate package

Hi Michael, I never bothered to implement more than 'd', but I am happy to contribute my sysvrc shell snippet I use as replacement for systems without systemd-tmpfiles installed. ``` do_tmpfiles() { local type path mode user group age argument if [ -r "$1" ]; then if [ -x

Bug#812215: consider spliting systemd-tmpfiles into separate package

On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 07:41:59AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 04:24:21PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > > > I never bothered to implement more than 'd', but I am happy to > > contribute my sysvrc shell snippet I use as replacement for systems > > without

Bug#812215: consider spliting systemd-tmpfiles into separate package

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016, at 16:41, Josh Triplett wrote: > Implementing the various operation letters makes up half the problem. > The other half involves handling the various tmpfiles.d directories and > the precedence between them. That includes the usual "override files > with the same filename"

Bug#813372: systemd: does not boot

> -Original Message- > From: Ansgar Burchardt [mailto:ans...@debian.org] > Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 2:27 PM > To: 813...@bugs.debian.org; Suchánek Michal > Subject: Re: Bug#813372: systemd: does not boot > > On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 14:06 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > > This is the

Processed: [bts-link] source package systemd

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to