Re: Bug#845302: systemd: 232-6:Failed to boot, makes kernel panic when starting /sbin/init.

Dear Michael, On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 07:49:55 +0100 Michael Biebl wrote: > How did you apply the patch? If you do it via "patch < $patch", you'll > need to chmod +x hooks/mounts. The lintian warning should have been a > clue. Thanks. I missed this, re-check now. Then, I re-built

Re: Bug#845302: systemd: 232-6:Failed to boot, makes kernel panic when starting /sbin/init.

Am 25.11.2016 um 05:18 schrieb K.Ohta: > Dear Michel, > Sorry for very later. > I test your patch of initramfs-tools, but, don't mount /usr with auto at > entry of fstab. > > I tested below: > 1.debuild initramfs after applying that patch and install packages. >> W: initramfs-tools-core:

Re: Bug#845302: systemd: 232-6:Failed to boot, makes kernel panic when starting /sbin/init.

Dear Michel, Sorry for very later. I test your patch of initramfs-tools, but, don't mount /usr with auto at entry of fstab. I tested below: 1.debuild initramfs after applying that patch and install packages. 2.Boot *without* auto and nouser with /usr entry at /etc/fstab.-> Success 3.Boot *with*

Bug#826297: shutdown log instructions

OK but also mention there any long term bad effects if one leaves the shutdown log producing setup there all the time. (Also it would be cleaner if one could just enable / disable this... Oh, but that would need to write things to grub.) ___

Processed: [bts-link] source package systemd

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to

[bts-link] source package systemd

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #756604 (http://bugs.debian.org/756604) # Bug title: Misleading documentation about

Bug#845442: udev: does not honor configuration files in /etc/udev/hwdb.d

Am 24.11.2016 um 00:09 schrieb Norbert Preining: >> If so, udev should use that one instead of the one from >> /lib/udev/hwdb.bin. Can you provide us with a debug log from udev and/or >> strace. > > Output of journalctl with udev log level set to debug is attached. The Microsoft Natural