Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2016 23:08:52 +0100
with message-id <20161212220852.eanimjob2rrwi...@bongo.bofh.it>
and subject line Re: Bug#847991: initramfs-tools: upgrade to stretch in kvm
image fails when trying to copy 70-persistent-net.rules
has caused the Debian Bug report #847991,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 847991 udev 232-7
Bug #847991 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: upgrade to stretch in kvm image
fails when trying to copy 70-persistent-net.rules
Bug reassigned from package 'initramfs-tools' to 'udev'.
No longer marked as found in
I've reassigned this to udev since its hook is failing.
Ben.
Forwarded Message
Message-id: <20161212214234.797.94144.report...@jessie.vagrantup.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 21:42:34 +
Subject: Bug#847991: initramfs-tools: upgrade to stretch in kvm image fails
when trying
Hello,
I'd like to create a Debian package for an application that uses systemd
timers instead of cron jobs. Installing the `.service` and `.timer`
units is easy, one just copied them into `/lib/systemd/system/`.
My open question now is: how does one enable/start the installed timer
unit "in the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #845442 (http://bugs.debian.org/845442)
# Bug title: udev: does not honor
Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:03:00 +0100
with message-id <20161212090300.gb26...@fatal.se>
and subject line Re: systemd-networkd IPv6AcceptRouterAdvertisements doesn't
work
has caused the Debian Bug report #827424,
regarding systemd-networkd IPv6AcceptRouterAdvertisements doesn't work
Version: 232-7
Hello Michael,
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 01:20:19PM -0700, Michael Berg wrote:
> My original bug report was against systemd 230.
[...]
>
> With systemd 232 installed on my system, I currently see the behavior
> you describe of systemd setting `net.ipv6.conf.br_32.accept_ra = 0` and