Registration of TAG+=systemd udev rules?

2015-05-10 Thread Ian Campbell
Hello, In adding systemd unit support to the qcontrol package (#781886) I needed to add a udev rule (60-qcontrol.rules): KERNELS==gpio-keys, SUBSYSTEMS==platform, DRIVERS==gpio-keys, TAG+=systemd In order to tag /dev/input/by-path/platform-gpio-keys-event for systemd, so that the

Re: Registration of TAG+=systemd udev rules?

2015-05-10 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 15:39 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: Am 10.05.2015 um 15:37 schrieb Michael Biebl: Am 10.05.2015 um 14:46 schrieb Ian Campbell: Hello, In adding systemd unit support to the qcontrol package (#781886) I needed to add a udev rule (60-qcontrol.rules): KERNELS

Re: Registration of TAG+=systemd udev rules?

2015-05-10 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 15:37 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: Am 10.05.2015 um 14:46 schrieb Ian Campbell: Hello, In adding systemd unit support to the qcontrol package (#781886) I needed to add a udev rule (60-qcontrol.rules): KERNELS==gpio-keys, SUBSYSTEMS==platform, DRIVERS==gpio

Re: Bug#781886: qcontrol failure to start on boot sometimes (jessie, systemd?)

2015-04-16 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 10:28 +0200, reportbug wrote: On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 19:19:24 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: @reportbug (sorry I don't seem to know your real name), could you try adding a call to udev settle to the qcontrold initscript, in the start case right before the daemon

Re: Bug#781886: qcontrol failure to start on boot sometimes (jessie, systemd?)

2015-04-16 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 11:28 +0200, reportbug wrote: On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:21:06 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: BTW, when this fails the system still booted and you could login and fix it, i.e. it didn't stall the boot or anything, is that right? If that is the case a release note might

Bug#739721: systemd: NFS shares are not automatically mounted during boot

2014-10-19 Thread Ian Campbell
Control: reopen -1 Control: found -1 215-5+b1 On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 17:20:47 +0200 Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote: I'm going to close this bug for now. If you still encounter any issues and you have additional information, please let us know, so we can reopen the bug report. I'm seeing