og missed
the required "Closes: #nn".
Thanks!
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
100% sure). In my case it happens after
a regular boot though, not tried in emergency mode.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pk
stuff to systemd and failed, so now you make me hope that
I missed something obvious :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
,
--
intrigeri
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
Michael Biebl wrote (29 Aug 2015 15:50:40 GMT) :
Could you attach the output of systemd-analyze dump
Yes and no = send privately.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
of other ways for an
attacker to do what they want. Thanks in advance!
To end with, I'm wondering whether this email is really
about timesyncd.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
package a few
weeks ago.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
Hi,
Josh Triplett wrote (15 Jun 2015 15:56:33 GMT) :
[...] I do think this functionality from wheezy should be restored.
I'm aware this is not a poll, so just for the record:
Tails Installer will soon be uploaded to Debian, and then to
jessie-backports; it uses udisks whenever possible, but
Hi,
Martin Pitt wrote (03 May 2015 08:39:55 GMT) :
intrigeri [2015-05-02 12:36 +0200]:
Do you have any target date for this upload?
I quickly discussed that with Michael the other day. So far the plan
is to keep 215 in unstable/master until Debian 8.1, and upload 219
after that.
OK
mind
uploading it to sid whenever you need it there. The only concern
I have is about the removal of the $remote_fs dependency, that I'm not
entirely convinced with, as expressed on
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=782700#52
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
Hi systemd and lightdm maintainer,
please have a look at #782456 -- it might be local misconfiguration
(in which case, asking Ralf for the debugging info you need would be
very nice of you), or a bug in the new DM / systemd integration.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
Control: retitle -1 base: HP EliteBook 840 G1 laptop fails to halt/poweroff
after 15/12/2014 upgrade
FWIW, the very same laptop powers off just fine here with current sid.
intel-microcode 3.20150121.1 is installed, and my PID 1 is systemd.
___
(#771667).
The apparmor package in experimental now has moved libapparmor to
/lib, thanks to Martin's patch, so I believe that AppArmor support can
now be re-enabled in systemd/experimental.
Thanks in advance!
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
___
Pkg-systemd
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi Stephen,
Stephen Hemminger wrote (30 Nov 2014 17:09:27 GMT) :
When I attempt to shutoff my desktop system either via Gnome, poweroff,
shutdown or by directly invoking systemctl, the normal shutdown starts
but then the script invokes kexec on the new kernel.
Do
Hi dAgeCKo,
dAgeCKo wrote (17 Nov 2014 20:59:15 GMT) :
journalctl -al
[...]
Here are joined why you requested.
I hope that the provided information could help you.
Thanks!
However, the journalctl output seems to be empty (or is it my MUA?) =
may you please double-check that you were running
the first pass of making
sure that all basic debugging info are provided by the submitter!]
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman
be
a paragraph in the release notes that points to the aforementioned
documentation
?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg
, apparently this bug report is about two different problems:
1. Joseph's one is about a harmless warning message
2. Wayne's one was caused by a local misconfiguration
= so I think we should close it.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi,
can any of you reproduce this on current testing/sid (that is, with
systemd v215)?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
it upstream?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
Control: tag -1 + upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52630
Control: retitle -1 systemd-cryptsetup handles keyfile differently from
cryptsetup on plain mode
Hi again,
intrigeri wrote (16 Nov 2014 18:32:58 GMT) :
Could you please try to pinpoint which
, or to close it. I'll let the
maintainers make the decision, though.
(The only reason why it actually completes the boot, I guess, is
because the filesystems hosted on the missing encrypted devices are
not listed in fstab.)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
___
Pkg-systemd
. Retitling accordingly.
Next step for anyone interested is to check if things have improved
upstream in this area since v215, and if not, to check if there's
a ticket in their bug tracker.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
,
--
intrigeri
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
? Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
is fixed).
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
configuration (e.g.
/etc/network/interface, if you use ifupdown) and your /etc/fstab.
Ping?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman
Hi Giuseppe,
Michael Biebl wrote (21 Sep 2014 18:43:54 GMT) :
Are you sure this was actually systemd which unmasked the services?
Can you reproduce the problem (e.g. by re-installing systemd or
downgrading and upgrading systemd again)?
Ping?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
of time...
Any progress on that one?
Can you reproduce it on current Debian testing/sid?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg
of clues, so if one of the maintainers wants to take
it from here, don't hesitate.)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg
Hi,
John Goerzen wrote (25 Oct 2014 22:48:43 GMT) :
No journal files were found.
Ah, you've got the journal disabled. Then please grep logind in
whatever place your system logs live?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg
will try to take a look later, once I can find a VM to debug it.
Thanks a lot for caring about this :)
Just to be clear: is any of this a blocker in your opinion to enable
AppArmor support for Jessie (that is, in the next ~14 days), e.g.
with the patch I've proposed?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (24 Sep 2014 05:33:37 GMT) :
So, I don't think that the problem I'm seeing here is a blocker for
enabling AppArmor support in systemd. The attached patch implements
this. Once something like this is applied, I'll clone this bug report
to track the remaining problems
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (09 Sep 2014 00:14:30 GMT) :
So: yes, please. I've been waiting for it eagerly, and will submit
patches to the Tor upstream unit file as soon as Debian's systemd
supports this option.
I really want this to land in time for Jessie, so I've given it a try:
1. added
build system is that
AppArmor support is opt-out (if libapparmor-dev can be found, it's
enabled by default). But I'll trust you that explicitly enabling it
might affect the resulting runtime dependencies, and will try that :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
Control: tag -1 + patch
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (23 Sep 2014 17:01:21 GMT) :
Michael Biebl wrote (23 Sep 2014 11:59:22 GMT) :
a) I don't see any dependency automatically added on libapparmor1, and
I've no idea which binary package exactly should have it. Any hint?
Did you add --enable
, then.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
+ is
available in Debian, to replicate how we're doing it in the
initscript. I'll double-check once we're at this point, though.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/kexec
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
of `systemctl list-units --failed', run after switching back to
multi-user runlevel, might help.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman
,
--
intrigeri
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
41 matches
Mail list logo