Bug#751741: Processed: reassign 751741 to dh-systemd, reassign 751744 to dh-systemd, forcibly merging 751741 751744 ...

2014-07-27 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Hi Michael, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org writes: Am 26.07.2014 21:12, schrieb Michael Biebl: I completely forgot that we defer the actual start/stop/restart to invoke-rc.d in most cases (i.e. if there is a matching .service and SysV init script). So, yeah, we'd actually need to special

Re: Bug#751741: Processed: reassign 751741 to dh-systemd, reassign 751744 to dh-systemd, forcibly merging 751741 751744 ...

2014-07-26 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 26.07.2014 21:12, schrieb Michael Biebl: I completely forgot that we defer the actual start/stop/restart to invoke-rc.d in most cases (i.e. if there is a matching .service and SysV init script). So, yeah, we'd actually need to special case .socket units here or we change invoke-rc.d to

Re: Processed: reassign 751741 to dh-systemd, reassign 751744 to dh-systemd, forcibly merging 751741 751744 ...

2014-07-23 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Hi Paul, Michael, sorry for the late reply. I finally looked into this, and I realized that I’m missing context/time to test and investigate deeper. My vague idea is that we should mask sockets before the upgrade and unmask them after. Not quite sure when the proper point in time (in

Processed: reassign 751741 to dh-systemd, reassign 751744 to dh-systemd, forcibly merging 751741 751744 ...

2014-06-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 751741 dh-systemd Bug #751741 [dh-systemd] dh-systemd: postinst snippets should stop foo.socket during upgrades too Bug #751744 [dh-systemd] dh-systemd: postinst snippets should stop foo.socket during upgrades too Ignoring request to