Hello Christoph,
Christoph Anton Mitterer [2017-07-14 4:22 +0200]:
> You used "/etc/systemd/network/dmz.link"
>
> Wouldn't it be better to use something like 10-dmz.link?
Eeek, indeed! Thanks for spotting.
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=a9683ef10ce
Package: libpam-systemd
Version: 232-25
Severity: minor
It seems reasonable that non-login users should not have per-user
sessions by default. Using pam_succeed_if to skip creation for users
with /bin/false or /usr/sbin/nologin shells seems reasonable.
IE, the following (currently untested):
Hi Don
Am 14.07.2017 um 23:04 schrieb Don Armstrong:
> It seems reasonable that non-login users should not have per-user
> sessions by default. Using pam_succeed_if to skip creation for users
> with /bin/false or /usr/sbin/nologin shells seems reasonable.
>
> IE, the following (currently
Your message dated Fri, 14 Jul 2017 17:00:25 -0500
with message-id <20170714220025.uz3xspc6f6slnrmr@geta>
and subject line Re: Bug#868359: libpam-systemd should maybe not fire on
non-login users
has caused the Debian Bug report #868359,
regarding libpam-systemd should maybe not fire on non-login
On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 08:22 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Eeek, indeed! Thanks for spotting.
Thanks for improving and your other Debian work :-)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Hello there,
I'm affected with this as well. I've just run into this issue with a testing
virtual machine. It looks like to me that it is also the cause of mate-panel
not starting up along with dconf not being able to create a database in case of
a user with AFS home directory. Speaking of
