On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 05:11:06PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 27.09.2017 um 17:06 schrieb Marc Haber:
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 04:22:09PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> Ok, I've usertagged the bug for now so it shows up at [1] as a possible
> >> candidate for a backport for a stretch
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 04:22:09PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Ok, I've usertagged the bug for now so it shows up at [1] as a possible
> candidate for a backport for a stretch stable upload.
> Your patch applies (with a bit of fuzz) to our stretch/v232 branch.
> That said, it would be great if
Am 27.09.2017 um 17:06 schrieb Marc Haber:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 04:22:09PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Ok, I've usertagged the bug for now so it shows up at [1] as a possible
>> candidate for a backport for a stretch stable upload.
>> Your patch applies (with a bit of fuzz) to our
Am 27.09.2017 um 16:04 schrieb Marc Haber:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:47:34PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Do you need those fixes for the stretch/stable package or is it
>> sufficient if we fix that for sid/buster (and stretch-bpo)?
>
> It would be great for that to be in a stretch point
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:47:34PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 25.09.2017 um 08:50 schrieb Marc Haber:
> > tags #869995 patch
> > thanks
> >
> > I have worked in the last days with Susant Sahani to isolate this
> > issue and can confirm that his patches:
> >
Am 25.09.2017 um 08:50 schrieb Marc Haber:
> tags #869995 patch
> thanks
>
> I have worked in the last days with Susant Sahani to isolate this
> issue and can confirm that his patches:
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/6907/commits/e6800d3cfb48542634c25c24a6aae7587d97eb4f
>
tags #869995 patch
thanks
I have worked in the last days with Susant Sahani to isolate this
issue and can confirm that his patches:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/6907/commits/e6800d3cfb48542634c25c24a6aae7587d97eb4f
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags #869995 patch
Bug #869995 [systemd] interface stuck in "configuring" if SLAAC prefix
announced with preferred lifetime zero
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
869995:
On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 21:34:25 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 04.09.2017 um 11:05 schrieb Marc Haber:
> > This bug severely affects systemd-networkd's usability in Debian stable
> > and has been without maintainer attention for a month.
> >
> > Is there any way to help?
>
> The
Am 04.09.2017 um 11:05 schrieb Marc Haber:
> This bug severely affects systemd-networkd's usability in Debian stable
> and has been without maintainer attention for a month.
>
> Is there any way to help?
The best course of action would be to raise this issue upstream at
This bug severely affects systemd-networkd's usability in Debian stable
and has been without maintainer attention for a month.
Is there any way to help?
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Marc Haber | "I don't trust
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle #869995 interface stuck in "configuring" if SLAAC prefix announced
> with preferred lifetime zero
Bug #869995 [systemd] interface stays in "routable (configuring)",
systemd-networkd-wait-online.service in failed state
Changed Bug title
retitle #869995 interface stuck in "configuring" if SLAAC prefix announced with
preferred lifetime zero
thanks
While investigating whether going back to stretch's systemd will solve
the issue, I found out that it does already exist in stretch and that
the fact that systemd-wait-online gets stuck
to be in DNS).
I think this warrants an "important" priority, if not a release critical
one. Please consider that.
Greetings
Marc
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 11:39:06AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> From: Marc Haber <mh+debian-b...@zugschlus.de>
> Subject: Bug#869995: interface stays in
forwarded #869995 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/6359
thanks
Hi Felipe,
I finally got aound to verifying against the github issue.
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 10:49:20AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Does the problem go away if you remove all the static configuration? This
> may be
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded #869995 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/6359
Bug #869995 [systemd] interface stays in "routable (configuring)",
systemd-networkd-wait-online.service in failed state
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 10:49:20AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Does the problem go away if you remove all the static configuration?
I have reduced the systemd network file to:
[7/232]mh@testsid85:~ $ cat /etc/systemd/network/testsid85.network
[Match]
Name=e*
[Network]
DNS=fec0:0:0:::1
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Marc Haber <
mh+debian-packa...@zugschlus.de> wrote:
> Package: systemd
> Version: 234-2
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> this is on a KVM VM running Debian unstable with a custom kernel. I do
> see this on other machines as well and have not yet investigated
>
18 matches
Mail list logo