On Sun, 14 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> problem. If ifdown isn't being called, I wonder if also sync is not
> called?
> It would explain file system corruption bugs etch / debian folk have written
> of across reboots.
Actually, the lack of a shutdown bus operation on ide, scsi an
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007, Paolo wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 12:13:34PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > their init.d/ scripts. Case in point was clamav-daemon, which didn't start
> > > on boot, expecting /var/run/clamav/ to be already there. Same for virus-DB
> > > updater freshclam.
In a message dated 1/13/2007 11:53:00 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Harry Coin]
> With the etch version of 'halt', the interface will not be brought
> down, both ifconfigs will report the interface works normally.
According to the report in bug #388244, wake-on-lan n
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 12:13:34PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > their init.d/ scripts. Case in point was clamav-daemon, which didn't start
> > on boot, expecting /var/run/clamav/ to be already there. Same for virus-DB
> > updater freshclam.
>
> They are buggy. They need to be fix
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 11:33:24AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Very strange. What is the content of your /etc/default/rcS and
> /usr/share/initscripts/default.rcS ? All should list 'no' as the
> setting for these options.
/etc/default/rcS
TMPTIME=0
SULOGIN=no
DELAYLOGIN=no
UTC=no
VERBOSE
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Paolo wrote:
> config, is a secondary point, main one is that RAMRUN - ie /var/run on
> tmpfs - and perhaps others, doesn't look like an acceptable option in Etch
> current, as too many pkgs don't expect volatile dirs under /var/run hence
> fail on (re)boot.
> Respective mai
[Paolo]
> no, this was a freshly netinstall'd notebook, kept in sync with Etch
> once a week at min. While I can't recall all opts taken in all
> steps, I'm sure I didn't go too fancy - I'm not used to mount even
> /tmp as tmpfs - but the result currently I have is:
Very strange. What is the cont
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 08:01:52PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Paolo]
> > while looking at an issue with tmpfs, to have /var/run *not* tmpfs,
> > I was suggested to check vars in subj but could not find any info on
> > that ( expect inspecting the code itself, of course).
>
> 'man 5 rcS'
8 matches
Mail list logo
