Re: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] NTP bites dovecot

2009-06-15 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Martin F Krafft] With dependency-based boot, we'd have to introduce another tag, e.g. timesync, and dovecot would have to wait for that. As documented on URL:http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts, $time is the virtual facility to depend on when one want to make sure the system clock is

Re: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] NTP bites dovecot

2009-06-15 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, martin f krafft wrote: 1. laptops that suspend/resume What kind of junk moves time backwards on suspend/resume? And if the operator did it on purpose, well, one should not shoot himself in the head if one doesn't want to die. I don't know if there is anything we could do

Re: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] NTP bites dovecot

2009-06-15 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org [2009.06.16.0430 +0200]: 1. laptops that suspend/resume What kind of junk moves time backwards on suspend/resume? An inaccurate hardware clock. 2. machines that are not always online but run something like ntpdate or chrony or