On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:02:11PM +1200, Dmitry Maksyoma wrote:
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 07:18:29PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
However, if Dmitry can confirm this is a real bug (as opposed to a
documentation issue, in which case it still needs a bug against
mount), then the solution is
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 12:43:29AM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
CC'ing Roger.
On Saturday 30 May 2009 21:49:16 Dmitry Maksyoma wrote:
Just to let you know: when /etc/mtab is a symlink to /proc/mounts, loop
devices
aren't freed by umount and the system may run out of loop devices
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 07:18:29PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
However, if Dmitry can confirm this is a real bug (as opposed to a
documentation issue, in which case it still needs a bug against
mount), then the solution is fixing mount rather than not fixing this
bug.
Running out of loop
On Sat, 30 May 2009, Dmitry Maksyoma wrote:
Just to let you know: when /etc/mtab is a symlink to /proc/mounts, loop
devices aren't freed by umount and the system may run out of loop devices
(which makes things worse than they were with old-style mtab). Apparently,
it's not a bug, as it's
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 09:39:17AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Just to let you know: when /etc/mtab is a symlink to /proc/mounts, loop
devices aren't freed by umount and the system may run out of loop devices
(which makes things worse than they were with old-style mtab).
5 matches
Mail list logo
