[sorry for late reply]
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 12:41:51AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> >
> > problem is, that fixes need to survive upgrades.
>
> It survives upgrades just fine, or at least it is supposed to by design.
hope so - we'll see on next round.
> Now, how the heck you ha
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007, Paolo wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 12:13:34PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > their init.d/ scripts. Case in point was clamav-daemon, which didn't start
> > > on boot, expecting /var/run/clamav/ to be already there. Same for virus-DB
> > > updater freshclam.
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 12:13:34PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > their init.d/ scripts. Case in point was clamav-daemon, which didn't start
> > on boot, expecting /var/run/clamav/ to be already there. Same for virus-DB
> > updater freshclam.
>
> They are buggy. They need to be fix
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Paolo wrote:
> config, is a secondary point, main one is that RAMRUN - ie /var/run on
> tmpfs - and perhaps others, doesn't look like an acceptable option in Etch
> current, as too many pkgs don't expect volatile dirs under /var/run hence
> fail on (re)boot.
> Respective mai
4 matches
Mail list logo
