Hi! https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111849/ is updated, another patch is
there, which use custom config file!
Thanks everyone!
2013/8/4 Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org
Hi Hu Zheng,
On Saturday, August 03, 2013 11:42:22 Hu Zheng wrote:
Done! See:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111849/
On Monday 19 August 2013, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
Other proposals, ideas, tweaks to the above most welcome, but let’s try to
come to a consensus on this matter before the end of this month.
then we can all move forward in confidence together, whatever it is we
decide.
after thinking about
My 2c,
On KDE 4 aka KDE SC 4, plasma was always just plasma,
no user says I'm using the plasma shell (as there isn't another
KDE option).
I think even if Plasma is numbered after 2, users will still say
they have installed KDE 5 or KDE SC 5, the marketing imo
must go to the whole SC 5 and not to
On Wednesday 21 August 2013, Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
My 2c,
On KDE 4 aka KDE SC 4, plasma was always just plasma,
no user says I'm using the plasma shell (as there isn't another
KDE option).
Incidently, the whole SC stuff, was never intended for marketing and public
communication, but it
2013/8/21 Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com:
On Wednesday 21 August 2013, Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
My 2c,
On KDE 4 aka KDE SC 4, plasma was always just plasma,
no user says I'm using the plasma shell (as there isn't another
KDE option).
Incidently, the whole SC stuff, was never intended for
On Wednesday 21 August 2013 11:29:52 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
My 2c,
On KDE 4 aka KDE SC 4, plasma was always just plasma,
no user says I'm using the plasma shell (as there isn't another
KDE option).
this might change. Consider Razor/LXDE joining the KDE umbrella. What then?
From one day to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112128/#review38285
---
Ship it!
looks good to me
- Marco Martin
On Aug. 17, 2013,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112128/
---
(Updated Aug. 21, 2013, 4:50 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112128/#review38287
---
This review has been submitted with commit
2013/8/21 Martin Graesslin mgraess...@kde.org:
On Wednesday 21 August 2013 11:29:52 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
My 2c,
On KDE 4 aka KDE SC 4, plasma was always just plasma,
no user says I'm using the plasma shell (as there isn't another
KDE option).
this might change. Consider Razor/LXDE
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112128/#review38288
---
This review has been submitted with commit
On Wednesday 21 August 2013 13:52:06 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
2013/8/21 Martin Graesslin mgraess...@kde.org:
On Wednesday 21 August 2013 11:29:52 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
My 2c,
On KDE 4 aka KDE SC 4, plasma was always just plasma,
no user says I'm using the plasma shell (as there isn't
On Monday 19 August 2013 21:56:35 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
Other proposals, ideas, tweaks to the above most welcome, but let’s try to
come to a consensus on this matter before the end of this month.
another idea: let's drop the version number completely and only use it
internally (bugtracker,
2013/8/21 Martin Graesslin mgraess...@kde.org:
On Wednesday 21 August 2013 13:52:06 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
2013/8/21 Martin Graesslin mgraess...@kde.org:
On Wednesday 21 August 2013 11:29:52 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
this might change. Consider Razor/LXDE joining the KDE umbrella. What
2013/8/21 Martin Graesslin mgraess...@kde.org:
Yes I noticed that for example you still talk about KDE as software in your
blog posts. To be honest I have to cringe if I read it, because it makes the
task of everyone more difficult who tries to work on the repositioning of the
brand.
Well if I
On Wednesday, August 21, 2013 17:12:10 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
2013/8/21 Martin Graesslin mgraess...@kde.org:
Yes I noticed that for example you still talk about KDE as software in
your
blog posts. To be honest I have to cringe if I read it, because it makes
the task of everyone more
I wonder: If KDE will not define and Release an internally consistent
'SC' anymore, then how should packagers differentiate between Minor
Version and Point Release Updates for their end users?
I understand the use of an RPM or Deb name such as Task-KDE-Plasma
used as a collection, defining
On Wednesday 21 August 2013 14:39:36 Rick Stockton wrote:
BTW, as a (mostly) end-User, I'm fine (and prefer) Plasma-2. But KDE
without base SC Releases will tend to fragment Distro content
selection, right?
sorry, I have to be a bit tedious here :p
isn't this material for a completely
2013/8/21 Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org:
On Wednesday, August 21, 2013 17:12:10 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
2013/8/21 Martin Graesslin mgraess...@kde.org:
Yes I noticed that for example you still talk about KDE as software in
your
blog posts. To be honest I have to cringe if I read it,
Hi Plasma folks,
This thread has been fascinating reading. I hope that after you reach a
tentative conclusion, that you make a proposal to a list with a wider KDE
audience, such as the KDE-Community list. KDE-devel, KDE-core-devel and
KDE-Promo are some of the other possibilities to at least ping
20 matches
Mail list logo
