[Differential] [Commented On] D2156: improve output identification

2016-07-20 Thread Sebastian Kügler
sebas added a comment. @davidedmundson Did you also get to try it? REPOSITORY rKSCREEN KScreen REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D2156 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sebas, #plasma Cc: davidedmundson, graesslin, lbeltrame,

[Differential] [Commented On] D2156: improve output identification

2016-07-19 Thread lbeltrame (Luca Beltrame)
lbeltrame added a comment. So far, no bad side effects that I can tell, even with the newer version. REPOSITORY rKSCREEN KScreen REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D2156 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sebas, #plasma Cc:

[Differential] [Commented On] D2156: improve output identification

2016-07-18 Thread lbeltrame (Luca Beltrame)
lbeltrame added a comment. I've been using this all week without ill side effects. In fact, this solves an issue I had when testing notmart's p-w branch. REPOSITORY rKSCREEN KScreen REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D2156 EMAIL PREFERENCES

[Differential] [Commented On] D2156: improve output identification

2016-07-15 Thread Sebastian Kügler
sebas added a comment. @davidedmundson Good point, I'll revert that one and will give it another good round of testing. It'd be nice if you could test once you're back next week (same for @lbeltrame, of course.) REPOSITORY rKSCREEN KScreen REVISION DETAIL

[Differential] [Commented On] D2156: improve output identification

2016-07-15 Thread davidedmundson (David Edmundson)
davidedmundson added a comment. > With this patch > > - we detect the case when multiple identical outputs are connected (same hash) > - each of the duplicate outputs also gets matched against the output name OK, that makes sense. But I think then you need to revert the

[Differential] [Commented On] D2156: improve output identification

2016-07-15 Thread Martin Gräßlin
graesslin added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS > sebas wrote in outputgrid_2x3.json:129 > What's the issue? the "No newline at end of file". Just add a new line. REPOSITORY rKSCREEN KScreen REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D2156 EMAIL PREFERENCES

[Differential] [Commented On] D2156: improve output identification

2016-07-15 Thread Sebastian Kügler
sebas added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS > graesslin wrote in outputgrid_2x3.json:129 > nitpick What's the issue? REPOSITORY rKSCREEN KScreen REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D2156 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sebas,

[Differential] [Commented On] D2156: improve output identification

2016-07-14 Thread Martin Gräßlin
graesslin added a comment. Looks good to me INLINE COMMENTS > outputgrid_2x3.json:129 > +] > \ No newline at end of file nitpick REPOSITORY rKSCREEN KScreen REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D2156 EMAIL PREFERENCES

[Differential] [Commented On] D2156: improve output identification

2016-07-14 Thread lbeltrame (Luca Beltrame)
lbeltrame added a comment. For now I didnt notice any problems (with version 1 of the patch), at least no regressions (notice that I wasn't able to reproduce the issue described in the bug since a long time). Is there any difference worth testing in the new revision? REPOSITORY

[Differential] [Commented On] D2156: improve output identification

2016-07-14 Thread Sebastian Kügler
sebas added a comment. @lbeltrame Does it work for you? If you can try this patch, that'd be awesome (also if it already works for you, to check if the patch breaks anything). REPOSITORY rKSCREEN KScreen REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D2156 EMAIL PREFERENCES

[Differential] [Commented On] D2156: improve output identification

2016-07-14 Thread Sebastian Kügler
sebas added a comment. @davidedmundson Sure. With this patch - we detect the case when multiple identical outputs are connected (same hash) - each of the duplicate outputs also gets matched against the output name The problem I'm fixing is that currently (without my patch) the

[Differential] [Commented On] D2156: improve output identification

2016-07-14 Thread Martin Gräßlin
graesslin added a comment. asking the evil question ;-) Can we autotest this? REPOSITORY rKSCREEN KScreen REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D2156 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sebas, #plasma Cc: graesslin, lbeltrame,

[Differential] [Commented On] D2156: improve output identification

2016-07-13 Thread lbeltrame (Luca Beltrame)
lbeltrame added a comment. I have two identical screens set up as part of my 3 monitor set. I can test this. REPOSITORY rKSCREEN KScreen REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D2156 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sebas,

[Differential] [Commented On] D2156: improve output identification

2016-07-13 Thread Sebastian Kügler
sebas added a comment. I'd like to get some feedback on the approach, however. I think this is actually a nice minimal fix, as we can't really change how the id is generated. I may be missing something here. This obviously needs some testing. It shouldn't break existing setups, but I