This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit R871:cfa43ed278c8: Read the new message string after rather
than before (authored by apol).
REPOSITORY
R871 DrKonqi
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://phabricator.kde.org/D28129?vs=78627=78628
apol updated this revision to Diff 78627.
apol added a comment.
address weird +2 in the code
REPOSITORY
R871 DrKonqi
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://phabricator.kde.org/D28129?vs=78605=78627
BRANCH
arcpatch-D28129
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D28129
AFFECTED FILES
sitter accepted this revision.
sitter added a comment.
Mind the comment about the +2 please.
Other than that looks reasonable.
INLINE COMMENTS
> backtraceparsergdb.cpp:215
> +case BacktraceLine::Info:
> +d->m_infoLines << line.toString().mid(KCRASH_INFO_MESSAGE.size() +
>
apol updated this revision to Diff 78605.
apol added a comment.
Don't leak
REPOSITORY
R871 DrKonqi
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://phabricator.kde.org/D28129?vs=78604=78605
BRANCH
arcpatch-D28129
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D28129
AFFECTED FILES
apol updated this revision to Diff 78604.
apol marked 3 inline comments as done.
apol added a comment.
Rebase on top of ksyntaxhighlighting, works great
REPOSITORY
R871 DrKonqi
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://phabricator.kde.org/D28129?vs=78117=78604
BRANCH
arcpatch-D28129
REVISION
sitter added a comment.
Mh. Not quite what I had in mind but I suppose it makes sense this way.
I think we need a test case for the highlighter though :| It totally blows up
in my face when I trace a running dolphin because toskip isn't quite right.
INLINE COMMENTS
>
apol updated this revision to Diff 78117.
apol added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Fix it in a theoretically better but more convoluted way
REPOSITORY
R871 DrKonqi
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://phabricator.kde.org/D28129?vs=77929=78117
BRANCH
master
sitter added a comment.
Quick recap from what we talked about on telegram: putting the print after
the bt is most definitely going to throw off the backtrace parsing logic, so
doing it this way would require extensive changes there, which is a dangerous
place to make extensive changes.
Or
apol planned changes to this revision.
apol added a comment.
Just tested it properly, it fails to generate a backtrace altogether :(
REPOSITORY
R871 DrKonqi
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D28129
To: apol, #frameworks, broulik, sitter
Cc: plasma-devel, Orage, LeGast00n,
broulik accepted this revision.
broulik added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
<3
REPOSITORY
R871 DrKonqi
BRANCH
master
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D28129
To: apol, #frameworks, broulik, sitter
Cc: plasma-devel, Orage, LeGast00n,
apol created this revision.
apol added reviewers: Frameworks, broulik, sitter.
Herald added a project: Plasma.
Herald added a subscriber: plasma-devel.
apol requested review of this revision.
REVISION SUMMARY
This way if we're linking against an old KF5, we still generate a backtrace
11 matches
Mail list logo