Re: GPL/LGPL licensing issues

2008-11-15 Thread Christopher Blauvelt
2008/11/14 Aaron J. Seigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Friday 14 November 2008, Davide Bettio wrote: > > why we used LGPL for all our runners/dataengines? > > no particular reason. probably because i was working on libplasma a lot and > just copied over the license headers between files as i was worki

Re: GPL/LGPL licensing issues

2008-11-14 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Friday 14 November 2008, Davide Bettio wrote: > why we used LGPL for all our runners/dataengines? no particular reason. probably because i was working on libplasma a lot and just copied over the license headers between files as i was working on examples, such as the time engine. and like mono

Re: GPL/LGPL licensing issues

2008-11-14 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Friday 14 November 2008, Davide Bettio wrote: > Hi, > > We need to relicense to LGPL these files too: they don't need to be LGPL > *kdebase/workspace/libs/libplasmaclock this should be LGPL is at all possible, yes. -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C4

Re: GPL/LGPL licensing issues

2008-11-14 Thread Davide Bettio
Hi, Il Friday 14 November 2008 22:01:23 Aaron J. Seigo ha scritto: > yes, i don't see any need to change the license on them. why we used LGPL for all our runners/dataengines? Bye, Davide Bettio. ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https

Re: GPL/LGPL licensing issues

2008-11-14 Thread Davide Bettio
Hi, We need to relicense to LGPL these files too: * kdebase/workspace/plasma/runners/ PowerDevilRunner shell_config *kdebase/workspace/libs/libplasmaclock clocknumber (I think that we can kill this one, it seems almost unuseful) clockapplet Bye, Davide Bettio. ___

Re: GPL/LGPL licensing issues

2008-11-14 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Friday 14 November 2008, Dan Meltzer wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Davide Bettio > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I think that these files need to be relicensed to LGPL: > > Are dataengines really considered libraries? Theres no actual linking > that occurs.. right? G

Re: GPL/LGPL licensing issues

2008-11-14 Thread Dan Meltzer
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Davide Bettio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I think that these files need to be relicensed to LGPL: Are dataengines really considered libraries? Theres no actual linking that occurs.. right? GPL should be just fine for them. > > favicons > filebrowserengin

GPL/LGPL licensing issues

2008-11-14 Thread Davide Bettio
Hi, I think that these files need to be relicensed to LGPL: favicons filebrowserengine sensoragent.h sensorclient.h sensorshellagent sensormanager sensorsocketagent (These files are located in kdebase/workspace/plasma/dataengines/) Bye, Davide Bettio. ___