Re: Good news regarding Qt 5.5

2015-05-11 Thread Simon Hausmann
On Friday, May 08, 2015 11:37:33 PM Marco Martin wrote: On Friday 08 May 2015 20:16:49 Hausmann Simon wrote: Nice - as a plasma user I'm looking forward to the lower memory usage :) Regarding the url interceptor: Could you make the feature optional? An applet that needs absolute

Re: Good news regarding Qt 5.5

2015-05-11 Thread Marco Martin
On Monday 11 May 2015, Simon Hausmann wrote: Ahh yes, new style applets would have to indicate in a .desktop file that they do not need their own engine (and use relative paths only). Do you already have a Version/MinimumVersion type of field? I know it's a bit painful to do this. But think

Re: Good news regarding Qt 5.5

2015-05-11 Thread Simon Hausmann
On Monday, May 11, 2015 10:23:42 AM Marco Martin wrote: On Monday 11 May 2015, you wrote: we are probably need this a bit more in the future, so I would really love to find a way to not lose it That's a fair point, but isn't that possible with one generic QQmlFileSelector or shared

Re: Good news regarding Qt 5.5

2015-05-08 Thread Marco Martin
On Friday 08 May 2015 00:51:19 Aleix Pol wrote: Hi guys, As you might know, I tried to get Plasma some time ago working on Qt 5.5 and failed miserably. [1] As you'll have guessed by the subject, that's not the case anymore, since the last patch by Simon [2]. This means Qt 5.5 is a firm

Re: Good news regarding Qt 5.5

2015-05-08 Thread Simon Hausmann
On Friday, May 08, 2015 12:51:19 AM Aleix Pol wrote: Hi guys, As you might know, I tried to get Plasma some time ago working on Qt 5.5 and failed miserably. [1] As you'll have guessed by the subject, that's not the case anymore, since the last patch by Simon [2]. This means Qt 5.5 is a firm

Re: Good news regarding Qt 5.5

2015-05-08 Thread Aleix Pol
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com wrote: On Friday 08 May 2015 12:49:45 Simon Hausmann wrote: During the investigation - we also talked about this on IRC - I noticed that plasma creates a lot of QQmlEngine instances - it seems one per applet. In the light of each

Re: Good news regarding Qt 5.5

2015-05-08 Thread Marco Martin
On Friday 08 May 2015 12:49:45 Simon Hausmann wrote: During the investigation - we also talked about this on IRC - I noticed that plasma creates a lot of QQmlEngine instances - it seems one per applet. In the light of each instance coming with its own garbage collection heap and its own QML

Re: Good news regarding Qt 5.5

2015-05-08 Thread Hausmann Simon
Same here :) Where can I find the url interceptor implementation you are using? Simon Original Message From: Aleix Pol Sent: Friday, May 8, 2015 19:17 To: Marco Martin Cc: plasma-devel@kde.org; Hausmann Simon Subject: Re: Good news regarding Qt 5.5 On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Marco

Re: Good news regarding Qt 5.5

2015-05-08 Thread Marco Martin
On Friday 08 May 2015 17:22:22 Hausmann Simon wrote: Same here :) Where can I find the url interceptor implementation you are using? repos: git://anongit.kde.org/plasma-framework.git git://anongit.kde.org/kdeclarative.git in both cases, the branch is called mart/singleQmlEngineExperiment

Re: Good news regarding Qt 5.5

2015-05-08 Thread Hausmann Simon
might run into crashes in the event that the package interceptor isn't thread safe. Simon Original Message From: Marco Martin Sent: Friday, May 8, 2015 22:10 To: Aleix Pol Cc: plasma-devel@kde.org; Hausmann Simon Subject: Re: Good news regarding Qt 5.5 On Friday 08 May 2015 19:17:32 Aleix Pol

Re: Good news regarding Qt 5.5

2015-05-08 Thread Marco Martin
On Friday 08 May 2015 20:16:49 Hausmann Simon wrote: Nice - as a plasma user I'm looking forward to the lower memory usage :) Regarding the url interceptor: Could you make the feature optional? An applet that needs absolute package:// urls would have to continue to create it's own engine.

Re: Good news regarding Qt 5.5

2015-05-08 Thread Aleix Pol
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com wrote: On Friday 08 May 2015 20:16:49 Hausmann Simon wrote: Nice - as a plasma user I'm looking forward to the lower memory usage :) Regarding the url interceptor: Could you make the feature optional? An applet that needs

Re: Good news regarding Qt 5.5

2015-05-08 Thread Marco Martin
On Friday 08 May 2015 19:17:32 Aleix Pol wrote: probably could have known that using QQmlAbstractUrlInterceptor was asking for troubles, but... any idea? :) -- Marco Martin I have no idea. Can you push it into a branch? I'd be interested in looking into this. to try a

Good news regarding Qt 5.5

2015-05-07 Thread Aleix Pol
Hi guys, As you might know, I tried to get Plasma some time ago working on Qt 5.5 and failed miserably. [1] As you'll have guessed by the subject, that's not the case anymore, since the last patch by Simon [2]. This means Qt 5.5 is a firm candidate for Plasma 5.4. Also let me use this occasion