On Saturday, May 5, 2012 09:37:16 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Friday 04 May 2012 23:02:16 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > * combine present windows with application launching (e.g. SAL, Kickoff
> > > or
> > > KRunner)
> >
> > wrong. we just move this into kwin. no need to touch the shell. after all,
> >
On Saturday 05 May 2012 14:15:02 Marco Martin wrote:
> but having the shell and windowmanager merged in one process also gives
> strong side effects, as noted from stability to speed. a cpu intensive task
> by the shell can slow down the whole window namager (and i would love the
> window manager h
On this issue i must admit i still don't have a definite opinion, so what
follows are some toughts on random directions on the topic.
I see in both approaches solutions to many problems and cause of a new set.
having worked on the plasma active window strip in various incarnations makes
me feel
On Friday 04 May 2012 23:02:16 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Thursday, April 26, 2012 14:52:55 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > If we look around we see that both GNOME Shell and Unity went for an
>
> i will remind you that you wrote this in a few years and we can see how each
> has done. ;)
Please do so. I'
On Thursday, April 26, 2012 14:52:55 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> If we look around we see that both GNOME Shell and Unity went for an
i will remind you that you wrote this in a few years and we can see how each
has done. ;)
keep in mind that one of Microsoft's great progressions with windows was
sepa
On Thursday 26 April 2012 12:41:32 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Monday, April 23, 2012 17:42:42 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > My expectation from the sprint is that we will figure out a new
> > interaction
> > of the shell and windowing system which is not possible at the moment. We
> > have pretty much
On Monday, April 23, 2012 17:40:48 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> That doesn't mean that I won't work on libplasma2 and QML effort porting for
> the greater good, but they are not my responsability just right now, they
> will be int he future (I guess).
i think some may have the concern that if the meeting
On Monday, April 23, 2012 12:21:17 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> Those cannot be dismissed as "technology before vision" because we already
> have identified these things as crucial to move on with our vision. Now it's
this is, imo, the crux of the matter: "our vision"
many of the people who will be
On Monday, April 23, 2012 17:42:42 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> My expectation from the sprint is that we will figure out a new interaction
> of the shell and windowing system which is not possible at the moment. We
> have pretty much reached what's possible with Plasma tells KWin what to do.
> But turn
+1 to what Martin Gräßlin said though in my case I want to see the current
stuff ported to QML so we can support the current shell in the future, it has
a lot of advantages I'd like to keep.
On Monday, April 23, 2012 05:42:42 PM Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> My expectation from the sprint is that we w
Il 23 aprile 2012 17:42, Martin Gräßlin ha scritto:
> On Monday 23 April 2012 13:03:56 Marco Martin wrote:
>> On Monday 23 April 2012, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
>> > Or put simply: Homework first.
>> >
>> > Now if the sprint would be: let's take two days to reflect on the current
>> > state and defi
On Monday, April 23, 2012 02:33:45 PM Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> Addressing these two concerns individually:
>
> On Friday, April 20, 2012 15:19:14 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> > 1-Everybody joings libplasma2 development, coordination is a mess, lot of
> > new people working in old code etc, not ideal.
>
On Monday 23 April 2012 13:03:56 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Monday 23 April 2012, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Or put simply: Homework first.
> >
> > Now if the sprint would be: let's take two days to reflect on the current
> > state and define where we want to go, and then take 5 days to sit down and
Addressing these two concerns individually:
On Friday, April 20, 2012 15:19:14 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> 1-Everybody joings libplasma2 development, coordination is a mess, lot of
> new people working in old code etc, not ideal.
I don't see why this would happen, we just need to coordinate and talk t
On Monday 23 April 2012, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> Or put simply: Homework first.
>
> Now if the sprint would be: let's take two days to reflect on the current
> state and define where we want to go, and then take 5 days to sit down and
> clear the road for getting there, that would be an approach
On Friday, April 20, 2012 15:39:02 Daker Fernandes Pinheiro wrote:
> I also agree that the vision must be over the limitations, specially
> when the concern is how to prioritize the development.
In principle, basing development of technology onto a vision is the correct
approach. There's a big b
On 04/20/2012 11:33 AM, Dario Freddi wrote:
Il 20 aprile 2012 15:40, Martin Gräßlin ha scritto:
On Friday 20 April 2012 15:19:14 Alex Fiestas wrote:
On Friday, April 20, 2012 02:20:58 PM Marco Martin wrote:
I expressed my concerns before, i'll do it again: i think this is really
not the time
Il 20 aprile 2012 15:40, Martin Gräßlin ha scritto:
> On Friday 20 April 2012 15:19:14 Alex Fiestas wrote:
>> On Friday, April 20, 2012 02:20:58 PM Marco Martin wrote:
>> > I expressed my concerns before, i'll do it again: i think this is really
>> > not the time to do it, any good intention and v
On Friday 20 April 2012 15:19:14 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> On Friday, April 20, 2012 02:20:58 PM Marco Martin wrote:
> > I expressed my concerns before, i'll do it again: i think this is really
> > not the time to do it, any good intention and vision is not much use if
> > there is not the technical fo
On Friday, April 20, 2012 02:20:58 PM Marco Martin wrote:
> I expressed my concerns before, i'll do it again: i think this is really not
> the time to do it, any good intention and vision is not much use if there
> is not the technical foundation being layd down, and at the moment there
> isn't. i
On Thursday 19 April 2012, Alex Fiestas wrote:
> Hi there !
>
> It is official, The vision sprint is going to take place in Pineda de Mar
> (Barcelona) from 11 Jun to 18 Jun !
>
> Just as a reminder, we will * NOT * do any programing in there, the sprint
> is to create a Vision and to plan the wo
On Thursday, 19. April 2012. 12.15.42 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> On Thursday, April 19, 2012 08:52:53 AM Ivan Čukić wrote:
> > It needs live video feeds. Some of us would like to chime in while
> > unable to go to Barcelona for the meeting.
>
> Dunno if we will be able to do that :/ but I we will try !
On Thursday, April 19, 2012 08:52:53 AM Ivan Čukić wrote:
> It needs live video feeds. Some of us would like to chime in while
> unable to go to Barcelona for the meeting.
Dunno if we will be able to do that :/ but I we will try ! at least we can do
voice + irc (something that is done in UDS) that
Il 19 aprile 2012 08:52, Ivan Čukić ha scritto:
> It needs live video feeds. Some of us would like to chime in while
> unable to go to Barcelona for the meeting.
That's indeed a good idea, which makes me thing about something which
in last Solid sprint worked out quite well. What about doing some
It needs live video feeds. Some of us would like to chime in while
unable to go to Barcelona for the meeting.
Cheerio!
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
25 matches
Mail list logo
