Re: Re: reflecting on 4.10

2013-01-15 Thread Alex Fiestas
On Monday 14 January 2013 17:37:28 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: I'll add only one semi-new point: * active, healthy communication between components teams. no more developing in caves. no more not talking to each other. broad, inter-component coordination. Development plans and progress should

Re: Re: reflecting on 4.10

2013-01-14 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Saturday 12 January 2013 17:56:14 Kevin Ottens wrote: [*] Historical note no one will probably care about actually, i care :) i rather suspected this was the case, given the number of developers i've heard this same kind of story from. the reason for moving to packages varies, but

Re: Re: Re: reflecting on 4.10

2013-01-14 Thread Alex Fiestas
On Monday 14 January 2013 11:16:43 Martin Gräßlin wrote: On Saturday 12 January 2013 17:56:14 Kevin Ottens wrote: [*] Historical note no one will probably care about actually, i care :) i rather suspected this was the case, given the number of developers i've heard this same kind

Re: Re: reflecting on 4.10

2013-01-12 Thread Alex Fiestas
On Friday 11 January 2013 20:37:58 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: On Friday, January 11, 2013 18:37:44 Alex Fiestas wrote: If we want to discuss this, we should start another thread for not going off topic. imho it's completely on topic. Very well then We talked about quality, reviews and process

Re: Re: reflecting on 4.10

2013-01-12 Thread Alex Fiestas
This is my opinion now (no longer what I remember from the sprint). On Saturday 12 January 2013 15:54:39 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: On Saturday, January 12, 2013 14:08:44 Alex Fiestas wrote: -Master -Integration this is what we are doing now in plasma-mobile. it has taken a bit to get used to

Re: Re: reflecting on 4.10

2013-01-12 Thread Alex Fiestas
On Saturday 12 January 2013 17:57:37 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: On Saturday, January 12, 2013 17:38:03 Marco Martin wrote: wonder how much scales for something as big as the kde-workspace repo... my experience with plasma-mobile seems to indicate that it is easily done by one person. i wouldn't

Re: Re: reflecting on 4.10

2013-01-12 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Saturday 12 January 2013 18:45:07 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: if they are targetted for 4.11 (or some future release even?) we'll need to figure out how to deal with these separate repos. do they end up merged into kde-workspace? do we put them as child repos of kde-workspace and rely on

Re: Re: reflecting on 4.10

2013-01-12 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Saturday 12 January 2013 18:54:23 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: so i'd like to see *more* reviewboard input rather than less. it would be totally awesome if more people would do reviews outside their normal teritory. E.g. me doing more reviews of Plasma stuff, but also Plasma people doing more

Re: Re: reflecting on 4.10

2013-01-12 Thread Alex Fiestas
On Saturday 12 January 2013 18:54:23 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: On Saturday, January 12, 2013 18:29:22 Alex Fiestas wrote: In the recent past, we have had people giving ship it in reviewboard to code that was not maintained by them and what is worst modifications that broke (or still breaks)

Re: Re: Re: reflecting on 4.10

2013-01-12 Thread Alex Fiestas
On Saturday 12 January 2013 19:13:29 Martin Gräßlin wrote: On Saturday 12 January 2013 18:45:07 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: if they are targetted for 4.11 (or some future release even?) we'll need to figure out how to deal with these separate repos. do they end up merged into kde-workspace? do

Re: Re: reflecting on 4.10

2013-01-12 Thread Alex Fiestas
On Saturday 12 January 2013 18:45:07 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: we have 3 repositories which probably should target 4.11: * kscreen (playground/base/) * libkscreen (playground/libs/) * kio_mtp (playground/base/) they have a few things in common: * they are all worked on by Alex F. :) *

Re: Re: reflecting on 4.10

2013-01-11 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Friday 11 January 2013 17:26:39 Marco Martin wrote: On Friday 11 January 2013, Marco Martin wrote: On Thursday 10 January 2013, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: hello. we're nearly at the point of releasing 4.10. with this development cycle very fresh in mind, it is a reasonble time to

Re: Re: Re: reflecting on 4.10

2013-01-11 Thread Alex Fiestas
If we want to discuss this, we should start another thread for not going off topic. In the workspace sprint we had some ideas about this. ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Re: Re: reflecting on 4.10

2013-01-11 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Friday 11 January 2013 20:37:37 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: On Friday, January 11, 2013 17:53:34 Martin Gräßlin wrote: I think it's needed and I think nobody in our inner development circle can be part of it. We are all blind :-) i've already said this in another email, but this is only half

Re: Re: reflecting on 4.10

2013-01-11 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Friday 11 January 2013 15:20:42 Weng Xuetian wrote: On Friday 11 January 2013 17:26:39,Marco Martin : On Friday 11 January 2013, Marco Martin wrote: On Thursday 10 January 2013, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: hello. we're nearly at the point of releasing 4.10. with this development

Re: Re: reflecting on 4.10

2013-01-11 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Saturday 12 January 2013 00:52:36 Luca Beltrame wrote: In data venerdì 11 gennaio 2013 22:58:49, Martin Gräßlin ha scritto: Granted, not everyone is using Kubuntu, but I do think that other distros could do similar (not looking into a particular direction, but there's a Geeko on my desk)