Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-06-19 Thread Hugo Pereira Da Costa
On 06/17/2014 10:56 AM, Marco Martin wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com mailto:notm...@gmail.com wrote: On Thursday 15 May 2014 11:39:00 Jens Reuterberg wrote: Ok so after the feedback from the Beta Release an issue that we knew was coming

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-06-19 Thread Jens Reuterberg
I guess I am sooo not the dude to say this as it's technical in nature but Aurorae theme is, as far as I recall, out as it has some issues speed wise (?) it was too taxing if I recall correctly (I'm sure I don't Martin G gave a handful of really good reasons why we shouldn't use it) But I

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-06-17 Thread Marco Martin
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com wrote: On Thursday 15 May 2014 11:39:00 Jens Reuterberg wrote: Ok so after the feedback from the Beta Release an issue that we knew was coming have happened. Visuals being the most easily accessible bit of anything technical,

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-30 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Thursday, May 29, 2014 15:09:33 Marco Martin wrote: On Thursday 15 May 2014 11:39:00 Jens Reuterberg wrote: Ok so after the feedback from the Beta Release an issue that we knew was coming have happened. Visuals being the most easily accessible bit of anything technical, people have

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-30 Thread Andrew Lake
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 6:44 AM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: On Thursday, May 29, 2014 15:09:33 Marco Martin wrote: just to give a shot on every and single options, i gave a try to modifying oxygen in order to make it look like breeze (therefore sharing all the things that it does that are

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-29 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 15 May 2014 11:39:00 Jens Reuterberg wrote: Ok so after the feedback from the Beta Release an issue that we knew was coming have happened. Visuals being the most easily accessible bit of anything technical, people have reacted negatively to the lack of change. just to give a shot

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-19 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 15 May 2014, Marco Martin wrote: btw, i added a small kde4 application in the breeze repo in the branch mart/kde4breeze that tries to set qtcurve, apply colors etc in the kde4 session. Do we go in this direction? so, this is in now. please test. one problem is: i need with

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-19 Thread Marco Martin
On Monday 19 May 2014, Marco Martin wrote: On Thursday 15 May 2014, Marco Martin wrote: btw, i added a small kde4 application in the breeze repo in the branch mart/kde4breeze that tries to set qtcurve, apply colors etc in the kde4 session. Do we go in this direction? so, this is in

Re: Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-16 Thread David Edmundson
QtCurve QStyle + Oxygen window dec is an option. I run it here, it looks ok. ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Re: Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-16 Thread Jens Reuterberg
Screenshot? On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:41 PM, David Edmundson da...@davidedmundson.co.uk wrote: QtCurve QStyle + Oxygen window dec is an option. I run it here, it looks ok. ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org

Re: Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-16 Thread David Edmundson
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Jens Reuterberg j...@ohyran.se wrote: Screenshot? http://imgur.com/Px6n2YO ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Re: Re: Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-16 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Friday 16 May 2014 13:11:37 David Edmundson wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Jens Reuterberg j...@ohyran.se wrote: Screenshot? http://imgur.com/Px6n2YO true, looks quite good. That's with gradient disabled, isn't it? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-16 Thread Marco Martin
On Friday 16 May 2014, David Edmundson wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Jens Reuterberg j...@ohyran.se wrote: Screenshot? http://imgur.com/Px6n2YO the buttons are quite alien, but may be bearable -- Marco Martin ___ Plasma-devel mailing

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-16 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 15 May 2014, Marco Martin wrote: btw, i added a small kde4 application in the breeze repo in the branch mart/kde4breeze that tries to set qtcurve, apply colors etc in the kde4 session. Do we go in this direction? err, would be cool at least to know if i have to invest time in this

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-16 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
On Friday 16 May 2014 13:37:34 Marco Martin wrote: On Thursday 15 May 2014, Marco Martin wrote: btw, i added a small kde4 application in the breeze repo in the branch mart/kde4breeze that tries to set qtcurve, apply colors etc in the kde4 session. Do we go in this direction? err, would

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-16 Thread Jens Reuterberg
I am already pinged and have pinged Andrew On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Thomas Pfeiffer colo...@autistici.orgwrote: On Friday 16 May 2014 13:37:34 Marco Martin wrote: On Thursday 15 May 2014, Marco Martin wrote: btw, i added a small kde4 application in the breeze repo in the

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-16 Thread Marco Martin
On Friday 16 May 2014, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: i see here a giant thread of opinions wether would look nice or not, and zero about concrete steps about how to solve the whole mess. that's not cool Do you need input from developers or designers? If designer input is needed, just ping Jens

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-16 Thread David Edmundson
We have an extra month. Lets do it. As for your application, I think we need a guard on if (QFile::exists( theQStyleRcFile ) { return; } so we don't trash user configs. group.writeEntry(widgetStyle, oxygen); seems wrong Is the plan to add a kconf_update script to run this? Or have it run by

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-16 Thread Marco Martin
On Friday 16 May 2014, David Edmundson wrote: We have an extra month. Lets do it. As for your application, I think we need a guard on if (QFile::exists( theQStyleRcFile ) { return; } so we don't trash user configs. group.writeEntry(widgetStyle, oxygen); seems wrong Is the plan to

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-16 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Friday, May 16, 2014 16:20:26 Marco Martin wrote: On Friday 16 May 2014, David Edmundson wrote: We have an extra month. Lets do it. As for your application, I think we need a guard on if (QFile::exists( theQStyleRcFile ) { return; } so we don't trash user configs.

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-16 Thread Ivan Čukić
at the moment is a kde4 application to be safer to access config of kde4 (otherwise i guess would be possible by just accessing ~/.kde or ~/kde4 going by attempts, but a bit more error prone perhaps) We should be able to check KDEDIRS first here? (It's unused in KF5, but could still be

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-16 Thread Marco Martin
On Friday 16 May 2014, Ivan Čukić wrote: at the moment is a kde4 application to be safer to access config of kde4 (otherwise i guess would be possible by just accessing ~/.kde or ~/kde4 going by attempts, but a bit more error prone perhaps) We should be able to check KDEDIRS first

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-16 Thread Andrew Lake
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Jens Reuterberg wrote: I am already pinged and have pinged Andrew Best I can tell, the new Plasma Next plan for visuals is: * Widget style: QtCurve with Breeze settings applied for qt4 and qt5 QWidget apps * Window decoration: Oxygen with background

Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-15 Thread Jens Reuterberg
Ok so after the feedback from the Beta Release an issue that we knew was coming have happened. Visuals being the most easily accessible bit of anything technical, people have reacted negatively to the lack of change. The issue WOULD be more ok from my POV if it could be contained towards me

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-15 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 15 May 2014 11:39:00 Jens Reuterberg wrote: Ok so after the feedback from the Beta Release an issue that we knew was coming have happened. Visuals being the most easily accessible bit of anything technical, people have reacted negatively to the lack of change. The issue WOULD be

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-15 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Thursday 15 May 2014 11:39:00 Jens Reuterberg wrote: Ok so after the feedback from the Beta Release an issue that we knew was coming have happened. Visuals being the most easily accessible bit of anything technical, people have reacted negatively to the lack of change. The issue WOULD be

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-15 Thread Ivan Čukić
QtCurve, i would say it's definitely possible. the thing that doesn't look that right is that is a 3rd party package that i'm not sure is maintained (since maintainers don't answer) I'm afraid that if we change it, that it will communicate that it is a final and usable version (talking about

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-15 Thread Kai Uwe Broulik
Am 15.05.2014 12:10 schrieb =?UTF-8?B?SXZhbiDEjHVracSH?= ivan.cu...@kde.org: A bit off: What do people think about adding an evil dialogue on startup, similar to what e17 had - to warn the users about the state of the software and its use in production environment? Don't we have a

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-15 Thread David Edmundson
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Jens Reuterberg j...@ohyran.se wrote: Ok so after the feedback from the Beta Release an issue that we knew was coming have happened. Visuals being the most easily accessible bit of anything technical, people have reacted negatively to the lack of change.

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-15 Thread Martin Klapetek
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org wrote: The performance will be bad with Aurorae (worse than with Oxygen). The crashes are now gone as we disabled the multi-threading. My position doesn't change on that: Aurorae is not suited as a default theme. This has

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-15 Thread Luca Beltrame
In data giovedì 15 maggio 2014 11:39:00, Jens Reuterberg ha scritto: The issue WOULD be more ok from my POV if it could be contained towards me personally but its affecting VDG work not to mention being a massive PR As David said, the feedback on Slashdot and Reddit is *always* negative and

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-15 Thread Ivan Čukić
Maybe we could make it the default and in combination with what Ivan is I'm actually not talking only about the style :) -- When the pupil is ready to learn, a teacher will appear. -- Basho ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-15 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 15 May 2014 12:15:07 Kai Uwe Broulik wrote: Am 15.05.2014 12:10 schrieb =?UTF-8?B?SXZhbiDEjHVracSH?= ivan.cu...@kde.org: A bit off: What do people think about adding an evil dialogue on startup, similar to what e17 had - to warn the users about the state of the software and its

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-15 Thread Ivan Čukić
Don't we have a plasmoid already for that? That report a bug thing? We could have that (or a similar one with warning text) placed on the desktop by default? Can somebody with good writing skills whip up something for this? hm, don't know, a plasmoid is too easy to remove and forget

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-15 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Thursday, May 15, 2014 12:40:55 Ivan Čukić wrote: Don't we have a plasmoid already for that? That report a bug thing? We could have that (or a similar one with warning text) placed on the desktop by default? Can somebody with good writing skills whip up something for this?

Re: Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-15 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Thursday 15 May 2014 12:21:34 Martin Klapetek wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org wrote: The performance will be bad with Aurorae (worse than with Oxygen). The crashes are now gone as we disabled the multi-threading. My position doesn't change

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-15 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
On 15.05.2014 12:16, David Edmundson wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Jens Reuterberg j...@ohyran.se wrote: Ok so after the feedback from the Beta Release an issue that we knew was coming have happened. Visuals being the most easily accessible bit of anything technical, people have

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-15 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 15 May 2014 13:35:21 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: On 15.05.2014 12:16, David Edmundson wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Jens Reuterberg j...@ohyran.se wrote: Ok so after the feedback from the Beta Release an issue that we knew was coming have happened. Visuals being the most

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-15 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Thursday, May 15, 2014 13:58:04 Marco Martin wrote: On Thursday 15 May 2014 13:35:21 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: On 15.05.2014 12:16, David Edmundson wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Jens Reuterberg j...@ohyran.se wrote: People always react whatever you do. Do not get

Re: Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-15 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Thursday 15 May 2014 14:08:29 Sebastian Kügler wrote: On Thursday, May 15, 2014 13:58:04 Marco Martin wrote: On Thursday 15 May 2014 13:35:21 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: On 15.05.2014 12:16, David Edmundson wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Jens Reuterberg j...@ohyran.se wrote:

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-15 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 15 May 2014 14:10:15 Martin Gräßlin wrote: On Thursday 15 May 2014 14:08:29 Sebastian Kügler wrote: On Thursday, May 15, 2014 13:58:04 Marco Martin wrote: On Thursday 15 May 2014 13:35:21 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: On 15.05.2014 12:16, David Edmundson wrote: On Thu, May 15,

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-15 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
On 15.05.2014 14:10, Martin Gräßlin wrote: On Thursday 15 May 2014 14:08:29 Sebastian Kügler wrote: On Thursday, May 15, 2014 13:58:04 Marco Martin wrote: On Thursday 15 May 2014 13:35:21 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: On 15.05.2014 12:16, David Edmundson wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:39 AM,

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-15 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 15 May 2014 14:23:47 Marco Martin wrote: * install the color scheme in the kf5 *and* kde4 proper folders, that are different * make the breeze color scheme default in both kf5 and kde4 ah, was forgetting: * apply the new icon theme too in both kde4/kf5 as soon we have it --

Re: Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-15 Thread Martin Klapetek
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org wrote: QtCurve is also there for Qt4, no? In that case, can't we share the theme and make both, Qt4 and Qt5 apps looks the same that way? yes, but we would change it also for their KDE 4 setup. I'm thinking...would that

Re: Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-15 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Thursday 15 May 2014 14:28:49 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: On 15.05.2014 14:10, Martin Gräßlin wrote: On Thursday 15 May 2014 14:08:29 Sebastian Kügler wrote: On Thursday, May 15, 2014 13:58:04 Marco Martin wrote: On Thursday 15 May 2014 13:35:21 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: On 15.05.2014 12:16,

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-15 Thread Luca Beltrame
In data giovedì 15 maggio 2014 14:31:27, Martin Klapetek ha scritto: I'm thinking...would that be a problem? We should perhaps warn users first, yes, but then it was their choice to co-install it on the very same machine Most distros will *not* ship PN as default configuration. So you might

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-15 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 15 May 2014, Martin Klapetek wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org wrote: QtCurve is also there for Qt4, no? In that case, can't we share the theme and make both, Qt4 and Qt5 apps looks the same that way? yes, but we would change it also

Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-15 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
On Thursday 15 May 2014 12:49:31 Martin Gräßlin wrote: I really don't want to have an Aurorae theme as default. It would undermine the fact that I told distros to not do that. We cannot bend ourselves like that :-) Plan B: Use a QtCurve-based windeco together with the QtCurve widget style?

Re: Re: Ship with Aurorae and Qtcurve or not...

2014-05-15 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Thursday 15 May 2014 22:37:55 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: On Thursday 15 May 2014 12:49:31 Martin Gräßlin wrote: I really don't want to have an Aurorae theme as default. It would undermine the fact that I told distros to not do that. We cannot bend ourselves like that :-) Plan B: Use a