Re: Thoughts about architectural changes in Plasma 6

2021-05-14 Thread Marco Martin
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 12:57 PM David Edmundson wrote: > > > though would be two different mainfiles in the package depending if > > it's loaded as containment or as an applet? > > Yes. Either potentially we can use the "X-Plasma-MainScript" property > in the metadata , or worst case we install a

Re: Thoughts about architectural changes in Plasma 6

2021-05-14 Thread David Edmundson
> though would be two different mainfiles in the package depending if > it's loaded as containment or as an applet? Yes. Either potentially we can use the "X-Plasma-MainScript" property in the metadata , or worst case we install as two packages and they both pull in the same private library. > --

Re: Thoughts about architectural changes in Plasma 6

2021-05-14 Thread Marco Martin
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 1:24 AM David Edmundson wrote: > > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 4:52 PM Marco Martin wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > Since KF6 work is starting, I've been thinkig a lot how i would like > > plasma to be refatored, since now there may be a window of doing some > > incompatible change

Re: Thoughts about architectural changes in Plasma 6

2021-05-13 Thread David Edmundson
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 4:52 PM Marco Martin wrote: > > Hi all, > Since KF6 work is starting, I've been thinkig a lot how i would like > plasma to be refatored, since now there may be a window of doing some > incompatible changes. > Here is a write down of this, wall of text ahead, I *hope* i expl

Thoughts about architectural changes in Plasma 6

2021-05-13 Thread Marco Martin
Hi all, Since KF6 work is starting, I've been thinkig a lot how i would like plasma to be refatored, since now there may be a window of doing some incompatible changes. Here is a write down of this, wall of text ahead, I *hope* i explained things clearly enough in there # Problem How do we want Pl