Re: more on the systemtray

2009-03-30 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Saturday 28 March 2009, Marco Martin wrote: now the services are called org.kde.SystemTray and org.kde.systemTrayDaemon, since the client is called KNotificationIcon, i think the services would make more sense as org.kde.NotificationIcon and org.kde.NotificationIconWatcher straightforward

Re: more on the systemtray

2009-03-30 Thread Marco Martin
On Monday 30 March 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: On Saturday 28 March 2009, Marco Martin wrote: now the services are called org.kde.SystemTray and org.kde.systemTrayDaemon, since the client is called KNotificationIcon, i think the services would make more sense as org.kde.NotificationIcon

Re: more on the systemtray

2009-03-30 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Monday 30 March 2009, Marco Martin wrote: On Monday 30 March 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: On Saturday 28 March 2009, Marco Martin wrote: eventually, should our hopes and dreams come true ;), this would see one more rename from org.kde.* to org.freedesktop.* yeah, but should be done only

more on the systemtray

2009-03-28 Thread Marco Martin
hi all, the systray thing is coming along nicely, there are some things i still wand to get ironed out before proposing the thing on kde-core-devel, kdereviev and making the thing moving forward (even propose to freedesktop..) renames: now the services are called org.kde.SystemTray and

Re: more on the systemtray

2009-03-28 Thread Richard Moore
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com wrote: another way could be as fredrik suggested me today, just pass x11 pixmaps handles, no copy, really fast, but portability issues? Just a note that I wrote a test case at tokomak 2 to check that passing pixmap handles around