On Tuesday 10 January 2012, Marco Martin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> so, 3 weeks have passed since the first effort of documenting the
> components.
here we go,
A first very rough version of autogenerated html from the comments:
http://www.notmart.org/plasmacomponentsapi/
--
Marco Martin
__
Hi all,
so, 3 weeks have passed since the first effort of documenting the components.
i think now most of the actual documentation in the comments is in a good
shape, so what are the next steps?
publishing on api.kde.org.
what is the state of the extractor python script?
a last effort to comp
Hey,
On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 12:14:58 Antonis Tsiapaliokas wrote:
> what i would like we end up with is auto generated html instead of copying
> and paste every single one in techbase ;)
>
> Hello, i have create an api tool for the components. You can download it
> from
> here http://quic
>
> what i would like we end up with is auto generated html instead of copying
> and
> paste every single one in techbase ;)
Hello, i have create an api tool for the components. You can download it
from here
http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=scratch%2Ftsiapaliokas%2Fqml-api.git&a=summary
There is a "REA
On Wednesday 21 December 2011, Giorgos Tsiapaliwkas wrote:
> Should i convert the doc into mediawiki style?
this is a topic of discussion.
maybe that could help anyways.
what i would like we end up with is auto generated html instead of copying and
paste every single one in techbase ;)
--
Mar
Should i convert the doc into mediawiki style?
--
Giorgos Tsiapaliwkas (terietor)
KDE Developer
terietor.gr
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
On Saturday 17 December 2011, Marco Martin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think we should do a real documentation sprint for the plasma
> qtcomponents, to have a good api doc for the 4.8 release.
>
> I have now merged the branch plasma-components-doc as the documentation was
> already good (and avoiding
On Monday 19 December 2011, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Saturday 17 December 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Saturday, December 17, 2011 13:39:05 Marco Martin wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I think we should do a real documentation sprint for the plasma
> > > qtcomponents, to have a good api doc
Giorgos,
If so, is best to do before the sprint.
Cheers,
On Sunday, December 18, 2011 05:40:26 AM Giorgos Tsiapaliwkas wrote:
> I am in.
>
> When me and Daker were writing the doc we didn't pay any attention to
> the coding style.
> Those days the plan was to write the doc with mediawiki format
On Saturday 17 December 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Saturday, December 17, 2011 13:39:05 Marco Martin wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I think we should do a real documentation sprint for the plasma
> > qtcomponents, to have a good api doc for the 4.8 release.
>
> and ideas / preferences on when a
On Saturday 17 December 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > well, was actually more thinking about an irc meeting, kinda like
> > bugdays, next week (or after the christmasy things if better for people)
>
> perhaps set up a doodle for people to register their preferred times and
> then we can promote
Master should be used now
On 17/12/11 18:35 Daker Fernandes Pinheiro wrote:
That's fine for me.
Marco,
I'm still working on the branch, should I submit the changes into it or
directly in master?
Cheers,
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 02:11:06 PM Marco Martin wrote:
> On Saturday 17 December
I am in.
When me and Daker were writing the doc we didn't pay any attention to
the coding style.
Those days the plan was to write the doc with mediawiki format. Is the
plan the same??
If yes, I can reform the coding style.
--
Giorgos Tsiapaliwkas (terietor)
KDE Developer
terietor.gr
___
Le samedi 17 décembre 2011 15:52:33 Daker Fernandes Pinheiro a écrit :
> Sounds like a good plan.
>
> Daker Fernandes Pinheiro
>
>
>
> 2011/12/17 Aaron J. Seigo
>
> > On Saturday, December 17, 2011 18:11:06 Marco Martin wrote:
> > > On Saturday 17 December 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > >
Sounds like a good plan.
Daker Fernandes Pinheiro
2011/12/17 Aaron J. Seigo
> On Saturday, December 17, 2011 18:11:06 Marco Martin wrote:
> > On Saturday 17 December 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > On Saturday, December 17, 2011 13:39:05 Marco Martin wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 18:11:06 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Saturday 17 December 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Saturday, December 17, 2011 13:39:05 Marco Martin wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I think we should do a real documentation sprint for the plasma
> > > qtcomponents, to have a
That's fine for me.
Marco,
I'm still working on the branch, should I submit the changes into it or
directly in master?
Cheers,
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 02:11:06 PM Marco Martin wrote:
> On Saturday 17 December 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Saturday, December 17, 2011 13:39:05 Marco
On Saturday 17 December 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Saturday, December 17, 2011 13:39:05 Marco Martin wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I think we should do a real documentation sprint for the plasma
> > qtcomponents, to have a good api doc for the 4.8 release.
>
> and ideas / preferences on when a
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 13:39:05 Marco Martin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think we should do a real documentation sprint for the plasma
> qtcomponents, to have a good api doc for the 4.8 release.
and ideas / preferences on when and where?
--
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerpr
Hi all,
I think we should do a real documentation sprint for the plasma qtcomponents,
to have a good api doc for the 4.8 release.
I have now merged the branch plasma-components-doc as the documentation was
already good (and avoiding conflicts with master)
I have to say congratulations to who w
20 matches
Mail list logo
