On January 4, 2010 01:17:45 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Monday 04 January 2010, Chani wrote:
> > On January 3, 2010 18:14:07 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > On January 3, 2010, Chani wrote:
> > > > looks like I have some work to do :/ what would kill the cashew?
> > >
> > > making it a custom containment
On Monday 04 January 2010, Chani wrote:
> On January 3, 2010 18:14:07 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On January 3, 2010, Chani wrote:
> > > looks like I have some work to do :/ what would kill the cashew?
> >
> > making it a custom containment and not adding any actions to it?
>
> no no, remember, this
On January 3, 2010 18:14:07 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On January 3, 2010, Chani wrote:
> > looks like I have some work to do :/ what would kill the cashew?
>
> making it a custom containment and not adding any actions to it?
no no, remember, this was all *working* in 4.3.
I had applet handles and a
On January 3, 2010, Chani wrote:
> looks like I have some work to do :/ what would kill the cashew?
making it a custom containment and not adding any actions to it?
--
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43
KDE core developer sp
On January 2, 2010 17:49:07 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On January 2, 2010, Marco Martin wrote:
> > > better. they need to be:
> > > * sharable between Containments (for consistency and code sharing)
> > >
> > > * allowed to be specific to the application or the Containment
> >
> > sick idea: how ab
On January 2, 2010, Marco Martin wrote:
> > better. they need to be:
> > * sharable between Containments (for consistency and code sharing)
> >
> > * allowed to be specific to the application or the Containment
>
> sick idea: how about making handles plugins? the base is really minimal, so
> mos
On January 2, 2010, Roman Shtylman wrote:
> I will make those style changes (was not aware of the coding style
great, thanks :)
> The reason for the x1...y4 is to avoid doing the calculation twice (in
> your example to fix it you still had the x1 there and that calculation
> would have to be done
Aaron:
I will make those style changes (was not aware of the coding style
page and tried to make it match as much as possible to what I saw).
The reason for the x1...y4 is to avoid doing the calculation twice (in
your example to fix it you still had the x1 there and that calculation
would have to
On Saturday 02 January 2010, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On January 1, 2010, Roman Shtylman wrote:
> > I was sitting around trying to organize some of my plasmoids... and
> > realized that you can't easily make a stack of plasmoids all exactly
> > aligned ... at least not that I could figure out. I tho
On January 1, 2010, Roman Shtylman wrote:
> I was sitting around trying to organize some of my plasmoids... and
> realized that you can't easily make a stack of plasmoids all exactly
> aligned ... at least not that I could figure out. I thought it would
snapping is a nice idea. putting it in the h
On Saturday 02 January 2010, Roman Shtylman wrote:
> The downside I saw with putting it into the DestopContainment was that
> handling things like snap on resize become much harder because the
> resize event has already happened for the plasmoid. To snap on resize,
> you have to adjust the new size
The downside I saw with putting it into the DestopContainment was that
handling things like snap on resize become much harder because the
resize event has already happened for the plasmoid. To snap on resize,
you have to adjust the new size during the resize event. Also, the
information about what
On Saturday 02 January 2010, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Saturday 02 January 2010 10:56:37 Marco Martin wrote:
> > On Saturday 02 January 2010, Roman Shtylman wrote:
> > > I was sitting around trying to organize some of my plasmoids... and
> > > realized that you can't easily make a stack of plasm
On Saturday 02 January 2010 10:56:37 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Saturday 02 January 2010, Roman Shtylman wrote:
> > I was sitting around trying to organize some of my plasmoids... and
> > realized that you can't easily make a stack of plasmoids all exactly
> > aligned ... at least not that I could fi
On Saturday 02 January 2010, Roman Shtylman wrote:
> I was sitting around trying to organize some of my plasmoids... and
> realized that you can't easily make a stack of plasmoids all exactly
> aligned ... at least not that I could figure out. I thought it would
> be really cool to be able to snap
to 3 pixels.
~Roman
From 9f2af11848d6ed72977beb8320c1d503a0f3978d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roman Shtylman
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 01:15:26 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] added plasma widget snap
plasma widgets snap to other plasma widget's grid lines
---
plasma/private/applethandle.cpp | 123 +
16 matches
Mail list logo