On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
On Thursday, March 21, 2013 23:02:21 amanjot singh wrote:
I have successfully created the list and the UI, but it comes in a
plasma-enclosed window of some sort and it's look is inconsistent with
the
look of the main
On Sunday, March 24, 2013 11:31:01 John Layt wrote:
On 24 March 2013 11:00, todd rme toddrme2...@gmail.com wrote:
That is good to know. So are there any plans for a qt-mobility
release any time soon? It looks like there has been a lot of
development in the last 2 years or so.
Qt
Hello,
the integration branch has been created.
All the requested branches have been merged into it.
Regards,
Giorgos
--
Giorgos Tsiapaliokas (terietor)
KDE Developer
terietor.gr
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 20:55:02 Jörg Ehrichs wrote:
IMHO all of these need to be replaced with the async variants. This
unfortunately affects a lot of your code. The service job should be
easy as you don't wait for the results, the service engine is less of
any easy change. You might
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109608/#review29861
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109608/
---
(Updated March 25, 2013, 3:34 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On 03/18/2013 12:46 PM, Martin Graesslin wrote:
On Monday 18 March 2013 12:04:36 Rick Stockton wrote:
This is _partly_ WRT Compiz/Kwin inter-operability, but only at the
highest level (hence the new Thread).
I suspect that nearly all users of Compiz/Kwin inter-operability do so
for one
Today's victim is
Dataengine
http://community.kde.org/Plasma/libplasma2/API_Review/DataEngine
One section is the usual methos by method what should be done to it
one section is a braindump we had about how DataEngine should change
architecturally.
in particular how to integrate models,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109709/#review29874
---
Ship it!
which branch is this in, so i can merge it into
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109693/#review29869
---
ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter/greeterapp.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109709/
---
(Updated March 25, 2013, 7:17 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109712/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Description
---
Makes it possible to use
On March 25, 2013, 7:09 p.m., Lamarque Vieira Souza wrote:
ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter/greeterapp.cpp, line 143
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109693/diff/1/?file=121351#file121351line143
Solid::PowerManagement::supportedSleepStates() is not a dbus call and
it already caches
On March 25, 2013, 7:09 p.m., Lamarque Vieira Souza wrote:
ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter/greeterapp.cpp, line 143
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109693/diff/1/?file=121351#file121351line143
Solid::PowerManagement::supportedSleepStates() is not a dbus call and
it already caches
14 matches
Mail list logo
