Hi all,
I'm not going to be able to come to the hangout (noons are becoming difficult
for me).
I've finished the structure that will be needed for supporting templates (the
generic properties for plugins thing).
There are a few questions thgouh.
0. How / where do we want the plugins to be
Plasma 2 meeting, 4th November 2013
Present: Aaron, Antonis, Giorgos, Marco, Martin, Sebastian
Giorgos:
- Make QML logging work for Plasmate
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,68939
- XWayland has missed its release
Marco:
- Work on shell mechanics to show widgets explorer and
In future can you clarify which Martin.
There are two in Plasma.
David (Edmundson)
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Edmundson
da...@davidedmundson.co.ukwrote:
In future can you clarify which Martin.
There are two in Plasma.
Well it was not me :)
Cheers
--
Martin Klapetek | KDE Developer
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Even the simplest of notes bear opportunity for mistakes, if one tries hard
enough.
On Monday, November 04, 2013 13:06:06 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Martin:
Grässlin
- Splash architecture: splash should probably go into SDDM, own process is
too wasteful
- XWayland has missed its release
--
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
Martin:
- Splash architecture: splash should probably go into SDDM, own process is
too
wasteful
While I agree that own process can be too wasteful, putting it inside SDDM
would mean putting it either into all login
Hi all,
we still have two shell packages (one real, one stub) and a stub look and feel
package in
plasma-framework/src/shell/qmlpackages/
they should be moved in kde-workspace for sure.
where?
and everybody agrees on doing it now?
Cheers,
Marco Martin
On Monday, November 4, 2013 13:19:37 Martin Klapetek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
Martin:
- Splash architecture: splash should probably go into SDDM, own process is
too
wasteful
While I agree that own process can be too wasteful, putting
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
On Monday, November 4, 2013 13:19:37 Martin Klapetek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
Martin:
- Splash architecture: splash should probably go into SDDM, own
process is
On Monday, November 4, 2013 15:21:27 Martin Klapetek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
On Monday, November 4, 2013 13:19:37 Martin Klapetek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
and means more
maintenance
Hi all,
since i was getting the activity switcher and widget explorer at least a bit
in shape in plasma2, i was experimenting with an idea we were toying a bit
around at the last tokamak.
Identifying all pieces of ui in the workspace that are completely modeal, like
splash, lockscreen/user
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113260/#review42954
---
Looks OK to me, but I'd like John to give it a last look.
-
On Monday 04 November 2013, Martin Klapetek wrote:
How is that more maintenance for us if the code lives standalone (compared
to being part of SDDM or whatever)? It would be moreless the same codebase,
just in a different directory.
The worst case scenario is that users do not get a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113260/#review42961
---
I've asked on the Qt Development list about Qt 5 Solaris
On Nov. 4, 2013, 4:12 p.m., John Layt wrote:
I've asked on the Qt Development list about Qt 5 Solaris support. I'm told
it builds and works to some extent, and patches are welcome, but not
without having been tested on a real Solaris build first, which I have no
desire to do. I
On Nov. 4, 2013, 4:12 p.m., John Layt wrote:
I've asked on the Qt Development list about Qt 5 Solaris support. I'm told
it builds and works to some extent, and patches are welcome, but not
without having been tested on a real Solaris build first, which I have no
desire to do. I
I spent my afternoon having a meeting about SDDM with Martin Briza.
(another Martin!)
It seems like there's a push towards SDDM for various political
reasons, so I will invest more time in that.
He's currently working on trying to replace KDM with SDDM within the
Plasma 1 timeframe. Currently he
On Monday, November 4, 2013 18:36:55 David Edmundson wrote:
I spent my afternoon having a meeting about SDDM with Martin Briza.
(another Martin!)
good to hear work is ongoing there; will be great to get this status info up
on the wiki with the other components. sebas is working up the template
On Monday, November 4, 2013 16:40:09 Marco Martin wrote:
http://im9.eu/picture/tg1706
http://im9.eu/picture/jj1706
http://im9.eu/picture/nv1706
it’s a very neat idea.
something that would also be interesting to experiment with in kwin is a
special presentation mode for such elements. if it
Hi,
it’s a very neat idea.
Really love it, too. And the blur effect is gorgeous!
something that would also be interesting to experiment with in kwin is a
special presentation mode for such elements. if it could be done with enough
performance/fluidity, it could be quite nice to “shove” the
On Monday 04 November 2013, Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
Definitely like the idea. Would love to see that for the notification
shade/history, too. (OSX *hint hint*) Give it more room and allow for
bigger, richer and more interactive notifications. Think of chatting or
pa uses the same look for
On Monday, November 4, 2013 20:25:44 Marco Martin wrote:
Pushing the desktop to the side is definitely nice but due to the lack of
input redirection in an X world, we cannot move all the window over a bit,
too.(?)
yeah, that's my concern as well, i would love to have it, but since is
On Monday 04 November 2013 16:40:09 Marco Martin wrote:
Hi all,
since i was getting the activity switcher and widget explorer at least a bit
in shape in plasma2, i was experimenting with an idea we were toying a bit
around at the last tokamak.
Identifying all pieces of ui in the workspace
On Monday 04 November 2013 20:29:26 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Monday, November 4, 2013 20:25:44 Marco Martin wrote:
Pushing the desktop to the side is definitely nice but due to the lack
of
input redirection in an X world, we cannot move all the window over a
bit,
too.(?)
yeah,
24 matches
Mail list logo
