---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/87/
---
Review request for Plasma, Akshay Ratan, Fabian Riethmayer, Sinny Kumari, an
> Martin
> ovious +1
Heh, I can always count on you when I mention c++11 :D
> Aaron
> yes, realy good idea.
Cool, I promise I will not go overboard like with some kactivities parts :)
Cheerio,
Ivan
--
Acting is merely the art of keeping a large group of people from coughing.
-- Sir Ralph R
On Saturday, June 22, 2013 16:38:56 Ivan ÄukiÄ wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Following the previous discussions on k-c-d where it was concluded that the
> workspace-related code (as opposed to the libs) can use more modern c++
> features as long as those are not introduced after gcc 4.5, I'd like to ask
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/48/
---
(Updated June 22, 2013, 3:30 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/48/#review34884
---
This review has been submitted with commit
49fcb63e705420da8dc
> On June 22, 2013, 3:24 p.m., Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > For absolute completeness, the sortCaseSensitivity property should also
> > have a NOTIFY signal .. but i don't see why anyone would ever bind to that
> > signal and it would require a reimplementation of the set method, so i'm
> > fine
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/48/#review34881
---
Ship it!
For absolute completeness, the sortCaseSensitivity pr
> obvious +1 (will do the same for KWin once 4.11 is branched). What about
> clang? Does it need an additional parameter?
Yes, it (fortunately) uses the same one.
--
Cheerio,
Ivan
--
While you were hanging yourself on someone else's words
Dying to believe in what you heard
I was staring straigh
On Saturday 22 June 2013 16:38:56 Ivan Čukić wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Following the previous discussions on k-c-d where it was concluded that the
> workspace-related code (as opposed to the libs) can use more modern c++
> features as long as those are not introduced after gcc 4.5, I'd like to ask
> wh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/48/
---
(Updated June 22, 2013, 2:42 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
--
Hi all,
Following the previous discussions on k-c-d where it was concluded that the
workspace-related code (as opposed to the libs) can use more modern c++
features as long as those are not introduced after gcc 4.5, I'd like to ask
whether there are objections to add the -std=c++0x flag to the
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Ivan Čukić wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Hi Ivan,
> I (think) I'm now properly detecting regular mice, touch-pads and touch-
> screens, based on some X properties of those.
>
> It would be very nice if people with touch-screens and touch-pads would do
> the
> following t
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Ivan Čukić wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi Ivan,
>
> I (think) I'm now properly detecting regular mice, touch-pads and touch-
> screens, based on some X properties of those.
>
> It would be very nice if people with touch-screens and touch-pads would do the
> following test
Am Freitag 21 Juni 2013, 12.01:26 schrieb Ivan Čukić:
> Hi all,
Morning Ivan
> I (think) I'm now properly detecting regular mice, touch-pads and touch-
> screens, based on some X properties of those.
>
> It would be very nice if people with touch-screens and touch-pads would do
> the following t
14 matches
Mail list logo
