Regarding QA of releases there is this task now:
https://phabricator.kde.org/T7949
This will most likely touch the general release process as well.
You are welcome to join the task as subscribers or with direct input.
First we need to collect ideas how to improve our QA.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 4
Plasma 5.13 kickoff meeting being scheduled if anyone wants to come along
https://doodle.com/poll/8wwrt59dt8prz6pf
Jonathan
On 6 February 2018 at 15:54, Nate Graham wrote:
> Congrats on a fantastic release of Plasma 5.12 everybody! People are really
> gonna love it.
>
> The release process was
On Tuesday, 6 February 2018 18:49:41 CET Luigi Toscano wrote:
> On Tuesday, 6 February 2018 18:34:34 CET Paul Brown wrote:
> > - Establish strict deadlines for suggested changes to media (texts and
> > videos) and strictly stick to said deadlines.
> >
> > [EDIT: Ivana has also suggested this, but
On Tuesday, 6 February 2018 18:34:34 CET Paul Brown wrote:
> - Establish strict deadlines for suggested changes to media (texts and
> videos) and strictly stick to said deadlines.
>
> [EDIT: Ivana has also suggested this, but here are my thoughts too.]
>
> So when the next-to-last draft of the an
On Tuesday, 6 February 2018 16:54:19 CET Nate Graham wrote:
> Congrats on a fantastic release of Plasma 5.12 everybody! People are
> really gonna love it.
>
> The release process was a bit rockier than expected, and I thought I
> might do a post-mortem to see how we can make the next one smoother:
Congrats on a fantastic release of Plasma 5.12 everybody! People are
really gonna love it.
The release process was a bit rockier than expected, and I thought I
might do a post-mortem to see how we can make the next one smoother:
Problem: Initial request for release notes was not seen by man
