On Monday, July 11, 2016 9:55:20 PM CEST Nicolas Lécureuil wrote:
> This is really a good news.
> thank you.
>
> Maybe a nonsense question, but is there a KF5 release planned as LTS to
> go with plasma 5.8 ?
not at all a nonsense question. It's something we have to discuss with the
frameworks
Le 2016-07-11 11:41, Martin Graesslin a écrit :
On Monday, June 27, 2016 2:28:42 PM CEST Martin Graesslin wrote:
Hi distributions,
in Plasma we are considering to add a long term support release. For
this
idea we want to get some feedback from your side to know how we should
set
this up.
Hey :)
Just a quick notice: All the judgement on this issue given by Debian
and Kubuntu people apply to Tanglu as well (and we completely agree
with Martin Steigerwalds post).
Cheers and greetings from Debconf!
Matthias
___
Plasma-devel mailing
On Wednesday, June 29, 2016 8:35:26 PM CEST Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> On 2016-06-27 14:28, Martin Graesslin wrote:
> > Hi distributions,
> >
> > in Plasma we are considering to add a long term support release. For
> > this idea
> > we want to get some feedback from your side to know how we
Hi,
Am 27.06.2016 um 14:28 schrieb Martin Graesslin:
Hi distributions,
in Plasma we are considering to add a long term support release. For this idea
we want to get some feedback from your side to know how we should set this up.
Here is an example (I mean it!) for how this could look like:
*
On 2016-06-27 14:28, Martin Graesslin wrote:
Hi distributions,
in Plasma we are considering to add a long term support release. For
this idea
we want to get some feedback from your side to know how we should set
this up.
From an OpenMandriva perspective:
We would like to know from you:
*
Good idea.
El mié., 29 de jun. de 2016 11:29 AM, Martin Gräßlin
escribió:
> Am 2016-06-29 15:34, schrieb Philip Muskovac:
> >> * how long should a LTS be supported?
> > I would be happy with your proposal, but it would be nice if security
> > issues could be evaluated for
Am 2016-06-29 15:34, schrieb Philip Muskovac:
* how long should a LTS be supported?
I would be happy with your proposal, but it would be nice if security
issues could be evaluated for the previous LTS as well. Doesn't need a
release, a note in the advisory would be sufficient.
Just as a note:
Hi distributions,
in Plasma we are considering to add a long term support release. For this idea
we want to get some feedback from your side to know how we should set this up.
Here is an example (I mean it!) for how this could look like:
* 5.8 first LTS release based on Qt 5.6 (which is also an