Hey,
On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 18:07:48 Viranch Mehta wrote:
> I read through the thread provided by Marco and I'd like to give in
> my bit of suggestion:
>
> We clearly do not want to mislead the user by giving him a misleading
> number (the remaining time). I agree with Aaron that this will mak
Hi,
I read through the thread provided by Marco and I'd like to give in
my bit of suggestion:
We clearly do not want to mislead the user by giving him a misleading
number (the remaining time). I agree with Aaron that this will make
the user trust his computer less. What I suggest is let the user
On Friday 15 June 2012, Shaun Reich wrote:
> Was it ever even mainlined? Thought it was just in some branch..
>
yes is in 4.9
--
Marco Martin
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
Am 15.06.2012 09:48, schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
On Friday, June 15, 2012 09:28:17 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Actually Shaun is right: we have removed all these things. If we
would
i am running kwin w/out compositing right now. so no, we have not
removed all
of these things.
when the various checks we
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Shaun Reich wrote:
> To me it looks less like a "discussion" and more like a "aaron got pissed
> because it didn't work for him, who himself is one person therefore nobody
> should have it".
Hi Shaun,
Just a quick reminder that KDE has a document regarding these
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Shaun Reich wrote:
> To me it looks less like a "discussion" and more like a "aaron got pissed
> because it didn't work for him, who himself is one person therefore nobody
> should have it".
>
how you exactly expect we engage in a productiive conversation about
th
On Friday, June 15, 2012 09:28:17 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> Actually Shaun is right: we have removed all these things. If we would
i am running kwin w/out compositing right now. so no, we have not removed all
of these things.
when the various checks were needed, we took the steps reasonable to fit
On Thursday 14 June 2012 20:08:10 Shaun Reich wrote:
> To me it looks less like a "discussion" and more like a "aaron got pissed
> because it didn't work for him, who himself is one person therefore nobody
> should have it".
I stopped reading your email right here...
It's a) unacceptable to point
Am 15.06.2012 08:55, schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
If not all hardware supports it, tough shit we've been shipping
compositing
on so much hardware that couldn't support it even in a remote sense
yet did
it anyways.
... and we have a way of dealing with hardware that doesn't support
it.
blacklists
On Thursday, June 14, 2012 20:08:10 Shaun Reich wrote:
> To me it looks less like a "discussion" and more like a "aaron got pissed
> because it didn't work for him, who himself is one person therefore nobody
> should have it".
this is not acceptable. i do not speak to/about you this way. i don't k
ew, why would it need to be a config option anyways? don't see the
point in that. it should just be on mouseover an icon switch and/or
tooltip. iirc this was exactly what some non-merged applet did. I
believe sebas was the one who made that one as well (which worked
well, i might add).
>This is no
2012/6/15 Shaun Reich :
> To me it looks less like a "discussion" and more like a "aaron got pissed
> because it didn't work for him, who himself is one person therefore nobody
> should have it".
This is not how things went. There has been an extensive discussion in
the past you can easily find in
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Viranch Mehta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed there is no option of "remaining time" in the latest stable
> released
> version of the c++ battery applet (4.8.4). Have we discarded it? I want to
> know this
> so I can know whether I should keep this in the qml vers
To me it looks less like a "discussion" and more like a "aaron got pissed
because it didn't work for him, who himself is one person therefore nobody
should have it".
If not all hardware supports it, tough shit we've been shipping compositing
on so much hardware that couldn't support it even in a r
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Viranch Mehta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed there is no option of "remaining time" in the latest stable
> released
> version of the c++ battery applet (4.8.4). Have we discarded it? I want to
> know this
> so I can know whether I should keep this in the qml vers
Was it ever even mainlined? Thought it was just in some branch..
On Jun 14, 2012 7:12 PM, "Viranch Mehta" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed there is no option of "remaining time" in the latest stable
> released
> version of the c++ battery applet (4.8.4). Have we discarded it? I want to
> know this
Hi,
I just noticed there is no option of "remaining time" in the latest stable
released
version of the c++ battery applet (4.8.4). Have we discarded it? I want to
know this
so I can know whether I should keep this in the qml version.
Cheers,
Viranch
___
17 matches
Mail list logo
