---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125991/
---
(Updated Nov. 19, 2015, 10:25 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125991/#review88578
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Sebastian Kügler
On Nov. 17, 2015,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125991/#review88548
---
Ping
I don't want to ease people installing applets (cf
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125991/
---
(Updated Nov. 17, 2015, 9:37 nachm.)
Review request for Plasma and KDE
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125991/#review88421
---
otherwise, looks good to me. I'll let others weigh in as
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125991/#review88427
---
Note to self: Disable drag area when applet is pending
> On Nov. 8, 2015, 3:37 p.m., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > Showing it always does make sense as long as it affects only a few
> > Plasmoids, yes.
> > About the undo: I'm wondering if it might make sense - for consistency's
> > sake - to do the undo mechanism similar to undoing the removal of a
> On Nov. 8, 2015, 4:37 p.m., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > Showing it always does make sense as long as it affects only a few
> > Plasmoids, yes.
> > About the undo: I'm wondering if it might make sense - for consistency's
> > sake - to do the undo mechanism similar to undoing the removal of a
> On Nov. 8, 2015, 3:37 p.m., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > Showing it always does make sense as long as it affects only a few
> > Plasmoids, yes.
> > About the undo: I'm wondering if it might make sense - for consistency's
> > sake - to do the undo mechanism similar to undoing the removal of a
> On Nov. 8, 2015, 3:37 nachm., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > Showing it always does make sense as long as it affects only a few
> > Plasmoids, yes.
> > About the undo: I'm wondering if it might make sense - for consistency's
> > sake - to do the undo mechanism similar to undoing the removal of a
> On Nov. 8, 2015, 3:37 p.m., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > Showing it always does make sense as long as it affects only a few
> > Plasmoids, yes.
> > About the undo: I'm wondering if it might make sense - for consistency's
> > sake - to do the undo mechanism similar to undoing the removal of a
> On Nov. 8, 2015, 3:37 nachm., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > Showing it always does make sense as long as it affects only a few
> > Plasmoids, yes.
> > About the undo: I'm wondering if it might make sense - for consistency's
> > sake - to do the undo mechanism similar to undoing the removal of a
> On Nov. 8, 2015, 3:37 p.m., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > Showing it always does make sense as long as it affects only a few
> > Plasmoids, yes.
> > About the undo: I'm wondering if it might make sense - for consistency's
> > sake - to do the undo mechanism similar to undoing the removal of a
> On Nov. 8, 2015, 3:37 nachm., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > Showing it always does make sense as long as it affects only a few
> > Plasmoids, yes.
> > About the undo: I'm wondering if it might make sense - for consistency's
> > sake - to do the undo mechanism similar to undoing the removal of a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125991/#review88162
---
Showing it always does make sense as long as it affects only
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125991/
---
Review request for Plasma and KDE Usability.
Repository: plasma-desktop
16 matches
Mail list logo
