Hi all,
we decided to cancel this weeks Monday meeting as most are at a sprint or just
don't have time today. Which would result in me being the only one with a
webcam around which doesn't make sense for a video meeting.
See you at next weeks meeting
Cheers
Martin
signature.asc
Description:
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 16:49:42 Mark wrote:
I'm not sure about this but someone with in depth git knowledge can
probably clarify on this. I think git has an option to at least show
which people commited to which file. If you simply do that for all of
git log .
in a given directory helps.
On 06/20/2012 09:19 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
Hi all,
this is a very raw synopsis of the meeting, i hope we can now transform it in
something very productive (i think the meeting especially the last part was
useful)
The meeting started from the realization that there is an 1% of cases where
the
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
this is a very raw synopsis of the meeting, i hope we can now transform it in
something very productive (i think the meeting especially the last part was
useful)
I found the meeting somewhere between great and
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 10:33:52 Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
What is missing from this discussion is how to use bugzilla efficiently.
we need to sort out how we work together first. trying to figure out how people
external to the team have their input integrated is something that follows.
--
On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 21:19:35 Marco Martin wrote:
this is a very raw synopsis of the meeting, i hope we can now transform it
in something very productive (i think the meeting especially the last part
was useful)
thanks for the summary Marco.
at the start of the meeting i also shared
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 11:29:55 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 21:19:35 Marco Martin wrote:
this is a very raw synopsis of the meeting, i hope we can now transform it
in something very productive (i think the meeting especially the last part
was useful)
thanks for
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
this is a very raw synopsis of the meeting, i hope we can now transform it in
something very productive (i think the meeting especially the last part was
useful)
The meeting started from the realization that
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 13:23:02 David Edmundson wrote:
I made a similar form for Plasma is available here:
http://community.kde.org/Plasma/Maintainership please fill-in as
appropriate.
there are 51 plasmoids in
On Thursday 21 June 2012 14:47:36 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
i can see having a list of maintainers for components that are strongly
maintained by an individual, such as the comics applet (to pick something
completely at random). but then ... using git i'd be able to figure that out
immediately as
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org wrote:
On Thursday 21 June 2012 14:47:36 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
i can see having a list of maintainers for components that are strongly
maintained by an individual, such as the comics applet (to pick something
completely at
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 16:49:42 Mark wrote:
Now this won't give the maintainer or any status but it does give an
idea if a certain component is even maintained.
that pretty much describes what i do when i want to check in on a given bit of
code (not just in plasma) ...
--
Aaron J. Seigo
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 16:49:42 Mark wrote:
Now this won't give the maintainer or any status but it does give an
idea if a certain component is even maintained.
that pretty much describes what i do when i want to check
Hello Plasma team,
I've heard that this group is experiencing some difficulties, and the
Community Working Group has been asked to intervene. We usually are
asked to come into crises, while we would really prefer to work with
groups to improve community. We've been developing a tool to help with
Hi all, hi Valorie,
Thanks a lot for this, and thanks a lot for an external person stepping in.
I think I might be one of the targets on why this IRC meeting is
conducted (I think I might show you that I am not entirely sure of
what is going on here, I only feel it might be about me.)
A few
On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 14:12:48 Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
The call for an IRC meeting mail starts with
it has become apparent that we need to do something here about the
attitude demonstrated by some of those who have chosen to participate in
plasma.
in which I would have liked the
On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 14:12:48 Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
I think I might be one of the targets on why this IRC meeting is
no one is a target at this, or any other, plasma meeting. it's not about
rooting out blame or villianizing anyone. rather we're going to try and re-find
our set of
On 06/20/2012 03:50 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 14:12:48 Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
I think I might be one of the targets on why this IRC meeting is
no one is a target at this, or any other, plasma meeting. it's not about
rooting out blame or villianizing anyone.
On Wednesday 20 June 2012, Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
I won't be there at the meeting unfortunately. I'll log it to read it.
Personally I like things to be said face to face that's why I take time
to write these mails. And I do feel targeted.
In any case I hope I clarified my position and if
Hi all,
this is a very raw synopsis of the meeting, i hope we can now transform it in
something very productive (i think the meeting especially the last part was
useful)
The meeting started from the realization that there is an 1% of cases where
the discussion doesn't go well and can get
20 matches
Mail list logo
