On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Víctor Blázquez
victor.blazq...@kde.org wrote:
I'm sorry for doing the move that fast, I should have realized it was sent
only to plasma-devel
No worries - in virtually all cases it is fine to process requests
when we receive them.
Víctor Blázquez
Thanks,
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Aleix Pol aleix...@kde.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Divendres, 3 d'octubre de 2014, a les 00:04:42, Aleix Pol va escriure:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Ben Cooksley bcooks...@kde.org wrote:
Hi all,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120489/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Repository: plasma-framework
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120489/#review67930
---
Your branch name in the review request doesn't make much
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120489/
---
(Updated Okt. 4, 2014, 8:27 nachm.)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120491/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Repository: plasma-framework
Description
On Okt. 4, 2014, 8:20 nachm., David Edmundson wrote:
Your branch name in the review request doesn't make much sense, we're in
frameworks here.
There's a test file tests/components/progressbar.qml can you run that and
check things still all look OK.
(btw, if you *want* you can
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120489/#review67932
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David Edmundson
On Oct. 4, 2014, 8:27
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120491/#review67933
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David Edmundson
On Oct. 4, 2014, 8:29
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120491/
---
(Updated Oct. 4, 2014, 8:41 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120489/
---
(Updated Oct. 4, 2014, 8:42 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
Hello all,
I just realized that in pushing the Breeze Dark color scheme to the
Plasma/5.1 branch of the breeze repo, it likely violates the string freeze
(the name of the color scheme). So when I pushed the new Breeze Dark icon
theme I only pushed it to master since the icon theme name and
On 05.10.2014 00:29, Andrew Lake wrote:
C. Further violate the string freeze by pushing the Breeze Dark icon
theme to the Plasma/5.1 branch to provide a remedy for the icon
visibility issues with dark application color schemes and with the
I don't think violating string freeze is critical
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Eike Hein wrote:
On 05.10.2014 00:29, Andrew Lake wrote:
C. Further violate the string freeze by pushing the Breeze Dark icon
theme to the Plasma/5.1 branch to provide a remedy for the icon
visibility issues with dark application color schemes and with the
Thanks much Eike. I'll make the request for an exception if there are no
objections to option C from others here.
No objections from me. We may as well ask translators anyway.
If they say no then we'll at least know what our options are.
David
___
On 05.10.2014 00:49, Andrew Lake wrote:
Thanks much Eike. I'll make the request for an exception if there are
no objections to option C from others here.
And thanks for the theme work, btw - big fan
of the Dark versions :)
Much respect,
Andrew
Cheers,
Eike
16 matches
Mail list logo
