Re: [platform-dev] Vote to stop bug auto-closing in all Eclipse platform projects

+1 for stopping auto-close I understand both sides and I don’t like to have so many bugs unattended, but that’s just reality due to lack of resources. ___ platform-dev mailing list platform-dev@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit

[platform-dev] Unit test fragment

Dear all, As discussed in yesterday’s SDK meetup I would like to see some real unit tests for platform related internals. Many non-trivial functionality is buried in private methods and are hard to test just from API. In order to add tests on a more fine grained level when solving bugs I would

Re: [platform-dev] How to add a bundle to the aggregated build?

Am 15.04.2020 um 21:44 schrieb Aleksandar Kurtakov mailto:akurt...@redhat.com>>: Ideally it should be added to one of the features and that's it. Technical alternative is to list plugin in

Re: [platform-dev] How to add a bundle to the aggregated build?

> Am 15.04.2020 um 17:05 schrieb Lars Vogel : > > The original target of this view was to replace the E3 implementation. Once > this is done, it would be part of e4.rcp > > You and Paul updated it over the last year. What is missing to replace the > old one? I have fixed a bug and

[platform-dev] How to add a bundle to the aggregated build?

We are using in an e4 RCP project the bundle org.eclipse.e4.ui.progress. The bundle is build with the platform-ui build. However, it is not part of the org.eclipse.e4.rcp feature by intention (see discussion in bug#559967) and is not part of the I-build repository. ATM we are building it

Re: [platform-dev] Saying Goodbye To SWT

Thanks Eric for all the work you have done. Thanks to you SWT for GTK has been improved a lot! The quality of your contribution is outstanding. The Che team can be glad to have you on board and will benefit from your work. ~Karsten ___ platform-dev

[platform-dev] Semantic version updates by 100 after 900

According to the Version Numbering guide [1] changes in the service segment are incremented by 100. I have now faced the first situation that the previous version already had .900 in the service segment. How shall be proceeded with an update here? Is .1000 a valid next increment? [1]

[platform-dev] Platform UI builds failing

The Gerrit build for eclipse.platform-ui are failing since recently with this error (e.g. https://ci.eclipse.org/platform/job/eclipse.platform.ui-Gerrit/20260/console ) 14:52:27 [ERROR] [ERROR] Some problems were

Re: [platform-dev] Is anybody monitoring new bug reports and forum posts?

Rolf, you are right. As a community all of us should take a little care of reading new bug reports (apologies from me, too). Although reporters should not expect that there can be a solution soon, at least some feedback should show that reports have been noticed. And if it is not Platform, then

Re: [platform-dev] Need to clone source code for Eclipse 2018-09 Project

I suppose you mean cloning the sources. Clone the respective Git repositories https://git.eclipse.org/c/ Search for the repositories you need, e.g. ‚platform‘, ‚equinox, and ‚jetty‘. The repositories are tagged for the release. Search for the relevant tags and

Re: [platform-dev] Build error - Invalid repo '4.7-M-builds'

> Thanks and Regards, > Sravan > > Sravan Kumar Lakkimsetti > IBM India Pvt Ltd, > Embassy Golf Links Business Park, D Block, > Off Indiranagar-Kormangla Inner Ring Road, > Bangalore - 560071, India > Phone: 91-80-41776858 > > From: Karsten Thoms [mailto:ka

Re: [platform-dev] CodeMining or Code Mining

I’d prefer „Code Mining“. I would like to argue that „Mining“ is an action verb and somehow disjunct from the noun „Code“, and describes the action that is performed on code. This is somehow different from „CodeLens“, which is a compound of two nouns. But I’m not a (natural) language expert.

[platform-dev] Fwd: [cross-project-issues-dev] EPL 2.0 upgrade => minor or major version change?

ss this > response to them on my behalf. > > HTH, > > Wayne > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Karsten Thoms <karsten.th...@itemis.de > <mailto:karsten.th...@itemis.de>> wrote: > In EPL 2.0 FAQ [1] it is mentioned that >"Us

[platform-dev] EPL 2.0 upgrade => minor or major version change?

In EPL 2.0 FAQ [1] it is mentioned that "Users and adopters of Eclipse projects should expect the next simultaneous release of each Eclipse project will be using EPL-2.0.“ For such an Eclipse project migrating to EPL 2.0, does this imply a major version change? Or is a minor version change

[platform-dev] Bug 528192 - Platform#getJobManager marked for deletion

.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=528186>. Please replace usages of this method by its replacement Job#getJobManager. Kind regards, Karsten Thoms Softwarearchitekt Telefon: +49 (0) 231 / 98 60-224 Telefax: +49 (0) 231 / 98 60-211 Mobil: +49 (0) 170 / 6369841 http://www.itemis.de <http:

[platform-dev] SWT Tools Update

Dear developers, with Bug#525976 a change to the MacGenerator & JNIGeneratorApp has been applied, effective from I-build I20171128-0100 onwards. Please make sure to update the SWT tools. Best,

Re: [platform-dev] [ide-dev] Article highlighting strengths of Eclipse IDE over IJ

Thanks Michael for this summary. It makes me feel that it is worth keeping fighting. Sometimes I also have the impression that it is often a very opinionated discussion, I just had this with one of my team members recently again. For me it is interesting where we could actually do something to

[platform-dev] Thanks for your vote!

Dear platform team, I am honoured for the nomination and your voting to become a committer for the Platform project! As Lars stated in his nomination, I have an interest in making the platform more robust and performant. Therefore I am looking at AERI and Sonar reports to find issues that I

Re: [platform-dev] SonarQube Configuration

o the same direction like having common coding guidelines, formatter > settings, ... > > Don't get me wrong, I would very well appreciate that, but needs to be > discussed in a broader context. > > Christian > > On 20.09.2017 13:49, Karsten Thoms wrote: >> I ha

[platform-dev] SonarQube Configuration

I have started to raise Bugzilla requests to optimise the SonarQube rules configuration. I believe that some rules are of no value for certain file patterns and just distracting from real issues. With your input we could make more use of the SonarQube reports and concentrate on fixing issues