Re: [platform-dev] Impact of Windows Defender and Eclipse startup

2019-06-18 Thread Daniel Megert
> Note: the exe file from plain SDK *is* signed Correct, and so are the executables of the EPPs and the installer itself. Tim, the original reporter of the issue, said: " 0:05 - time to extract 354mb JEE 2019-06 RC1 zip 1:28 - time spent by Windows Defender before Eclipse workspace prompt "

Re: [platform-dev] Impact of Windows Defender and Eclipse startup

2019-06-18 Thread Ed Merks
Andrey, I looked in older p2 repos and this file was previously signed. E.g., the following one has a signed eclipse.exe: https://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/updates/4.6/R-4.6.3-201703010400/binary/org.eclipse.platform.sdk.executable.win32.win32.x86_64_4.6.3.M20170301-0400 That is why I

Re: [platform-dev] Impact of Windows Defender and Eclipse startup

2019-06-18 Thread Andrey Loskutov
Whoever is interested in solving this problem, please create a p2 or oomph bug for that. I think missing signature on Windows is not OK, independently if this helps or not with the Windows Defender performance. Note: the exe file from plain SDK *is* signed. On 18.06.2019 16:52, Ed Merks wrote:

Re: [platform-dev] Impact of Windows Defender and Eclipse startup

2019-06-18 Thread Ed Merks
Rolf, Indeed if I look at the two executables in the following: https://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/updates/4.12/R-4.12-201906051800/binary/org.eclipse.platform.sdk.executable.win32.win32.x86_64_4.12.0.I20190605-1800 They do not show signature properties when extracted, so p2 installing

Re: [platform-dev] [SWT] Bugzilla etiquette question

2019-06-18 Thread Jonah Graham
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 08:46, Becker, Matthias wrote: > Hi all, > > I don't know how to do this: "Interested committers should register for > bug updates or incoming Gerrits of there component." > Can you please explain? > > To be clear, there is no way other than following the email/account for

Re: [platform-dev] Impact of Windows Defender and Eclipse startup

2019-06-18 Thread Rolf Theunissen
First of all, the properties of the executable show it very clearly. Second, https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=509799#c4 this comment. eclipse.exe properties from Eclipse IDE for Java Developers Package Eclipse properties for product installed via oomph. Op 6/18/2019 om 4:04 PM

Re: [platform-dev] Impact of Windows Defender and Eclipse startup

2019-06-18 Thread Ed Merks
Rolf, I don't believe what you suggest is the case.  The eclipse.exe in the p2 repository, like all the artifacts in the repository, is signed.    Otherwise, if one did an update and the executable needed to be updated, it would be updated with an unsigned version, which would not be

Re: [platform-dev] Impact of Windows Defender and Eclipse startup

2019-06-18 Thread Rolf Theunissen
Hi, I came across the bug below. What triggered me from the comments on Bug 509799 is, that the 'eclipse.exe' is apparently signed as part of the EPP build. As we are pushing Eclipse-Installer now, many installations contain a 'eclipse.exe' that is not signed. So maybe the problem is not

Re: [platform-dev] [SWT] Bugzilla etiquette question

2019-06-18 Thread Daniel Megert
Whether you first create the bug report and then reassign or whether you first assign to you and then cc the default assignee is a personal choice (I prefer the former, because I don't always know the default assignee, and I don't want to add it manually). However, the default assignee should

Re: [platform-dev] [SWT] Bugzilla etiquette question

2019-06-18 Thread Paul Pazderski
And for gerrit in Settings -> Watched Project. Add the project and check the type of change you're interested in. Regards, Paul Am 18.06.2019 um 14:49 schrieb Eric Williams: On 6/18/19 8:45 AM, Becker, Matthias wrote: Hi all, I don't know how to do this: "Interested committers should

Re: [platform-dev] [SWT] Bugzilla etiquette question

2019-06-18 Thread Eric Williams
On 6/18/19 8:45 AM, Becker, Matthias wrote: Hi all, I don't know how to do this: "Interested committers should register for bug updates or incoming Gerrits of there component." Can you please explain? In Bugzilla preferences -> Email preferences -> User Watching, add the default

Re: [platform-dev] [SWT] Bugzilla etiquette question

2019-06-18 Thread Becker, Matthias
Hi all, I don't know how to do this: "Interested committers should register for bug updates or incoming Gerrits of there component." Can you please explain? Regards, Matthias On 18.06.19, 13:26, "platform-dev-boun...@eclipse.org on behalf of Lars Vogel" wrote: Hi Nikita, I

Re: [platform-dev] [SWT] Bugzilla etiquette question

2019-06-18 Thread Lars Vogel
Hi Nikita, I don't think you need to cc someone. Interested committers should register for bug updates or incoming Gerrits of there component. If you want to have feedback on a change, add the person to the bug or better to the review. Best regards, Lars On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 1:22 PM Nikita

[platform-dev] [SWT] Bugzilla etiquette question

2019-06-18 Thread Nikita Nemkin
Hi all, When I create a bug assigned to myself, should I CC platform-swt-inbox? Or the affected port maintainers? Or nobody at all? -- Best regards, Nikita Nemkin ___ platform-dev mailing list platform-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options,

Re: [platform-dev] Startup times of bundles in Build id: I20190612-0115

2019-06-18 Thread Vikas Chandra
Hi Lars That is excellent data for startup performance measurement. I have captured the same at https://wiki.eclipse.org/StartupTimesOfBundles in the most simple way ( no tables etc for now) It will good to have equivalent data for 4.12 and few earlier releases for comparison. A regression of