Re: ftp.iso.pld-linux.org]

2006-09-29 Thread Piotr Skwarna
Andrzej Krzysztofowicz napisał(a): Piotr Skwarna wrote: Andrzej Krzysztofowicz napisaĹ�(a): Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?= wrote: ftp.iso.pld-linux.org is not answering is it planned downtime? when it will be up? Probably never. We lost the machine.

Re: ftp.iso.pld-linux.org]

2006-09-29 Thread Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
Piotr Skwarna wrote: Andrzej Krzysztofowicz napisał(a): Piotr Skwarna wrote: Andrzej Krzysztofowicz napisaĹ�(a): Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?= wrote: ftp.iso.pld-linux.org is not answering is it planned downtime? when it will be up?

Re: SPECS (LINUX_2_6): kernel.spec - rpm macros need utsrelease.h for ...

2006-09-29 Thread sparky
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 10:34:09AM +0200, zbyniu wrote: Author: zbyniu Date: Fri Sep 29 08:34:09 2006 GMT Module: SPECS Tag: LINUX_2_6 Log message: - rpm macros need utsrelease.h for external modules; rel 2 @@ -1184,6 +1185,8 @@

Re: ftp.iso.pld-linux.org]

2006-09-29 Thread Tomasz Mateja
Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: Piotr Skwarna wrote: Andrzej Krzysztofowicz napisaĹ?(a): Piotr Skwarna wrote: Andrzej Krzysztofowicz napisaÄšďż˝(a): Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?= wrote: ftp.iso.pld-linux.org is not answering is it planned downtime? when it will be

Re: [SPEC] bzr.spec upgrade to 0.11rc2

2006-09-29 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Friday 29 September 2006 22:26, arkh wrote: Hi! I'm sending a patch and a diff file to upgrade existing in our cvs version of this revision control tool. If the PLD policy doesn't allow to place rc version in cvs - just skip my mail :) In a few days there will be a full and stable 0.11

Re: [SPEC] bzr.spec upgrade to 0.11rc2

2006-09-29 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Friday 29 September 2006 23:35, arkh wrote: Weird, it works for me... Try this one, if it still doesn't apply, could you give me any hints for future what is wrong with this diff file? the tabs are lost in the diff. the first email it was also with CRLF line endings. don't copy paste the

Re: [SPEC] bzr.spec upgrade to 0.11rc2

2006-09-29 Thread arkh
On 9/29/06, Elan Ruusamäe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 29 September 2006 23:35, arkh wrote: Weird, it works for me... Try this one, if it still doesn't apply, could you give me any hints for future what is wrong with this diff file? the tabs are lost in the diff. the first email it