Re: smtpdaemon and sendmail wrapper

2006-11-06 Thread Jacek Konieczny
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 11:37:05PM +0100, Tomasz Wittner wrote: and what acts as smtp client (has sendmail(1) command) should have `P/O: smtp'. Do you suggest that sendmail command is the same as smtp client? It is not. There could be a sendmail command implementation doing no SMTP and SMTP

glibc compilation problem

2006-11-06 Thread Jacek Konieczny
Hello, I have encountered a big problem with glibc compilation on PLD-Th-derived system: glibc 2.4 build (from glibc.spec rev. 1.648) fails with: i686-pld-linux-gcc -nostdlib -nostartfiles -r -o /home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.4/builddir/elf/librtld.map.o '-Wl,-('

Re: glibc compilation problem

2006-11-06 Thread Jacek Konieczny
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 03:32:39PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: Or maybe I should try with glibc 2.5? Is it, as in PLD CVS, usable? I have tried. The same problem: : /home/users/jacek/axeos-rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.5/builddir/libc_pic.a i686-pld-linux-gcc -nostdlib -nostartfiles -r -o

Re: glibc compilation problem

2006-11-06 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:17:12PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 03:32:39PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: Or maybe I should try with glibc 2.5? Is it, as in PLD CVS, usable? I have tried. The same problem: Maybe too new gcc? glibc 2.5 builds for me with

Re: glibc compilation problem

2006-11-06 Thread Paweł Sikora
On Monday 06 November 2006 22:06, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:17:12PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 03:32:39PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: Or maybe I should try with glibc 2.5? Is it, as in PLD CVS, usable? I have tried. The same problem:

Re: glibc compilation problem

2006-11-06 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 10:08:02PM +0100, Paweł Sikora wrote: On Monday 06 November 2006 22:06, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:17:12PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 03:32:39PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: Or maybe I should try with glibc 2.5? Is

Re: glibc compilation problem

2006-11-06 Thread sparky
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 10:10:01PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 10:08:02PM +0100, Paweł Sikora wrote: On Monday 06 November 2006 22:06, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:17:12PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 03:32:39PM +0100,

fusebase specs names

2006-11-06 Thread Andrzej Zawadzki
Hello! I'd like to ask what is a proper name (maybe is some convection) for fusebase specs? For example we have: name - .spec cvsfs - cvsfs-fuse.spec fusesmb - fusesmb.spec I made spec for curlftpfs and I don't know how to name this. ps. it's works pretty good with FTP over SSL! -- Andrzej

Re: glibc compilation problem

2006-11-06 Thread Paweł Sikora
On Monday 06 November 2006 22:10, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 10:08:02PM +0100, Paweł Sikora wrote: On Monday 06 November 2006 22:06, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:17:12PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 03:32:39PM +0100, Jacek

Re: glibc compilation problem

2006-11-06 Thread Jacek Konieczny
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 10:08:02PM +0100, Paweł Sikora wrote: On Monday 06 November 2006 22:06, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:17:12PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 03:32:39PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: Or maybe I should try with glibc 2.5? Is