On Thursday 05 February 2009 13:11:23 Jacek Konieczny wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 10:07:49AM +0100, Paweł Zuzelski wrote:
What about packages like beanshell? It may be used as java libraries and
as stand-alone application. Should we rename it to java-...?
Maybe a beanshell.spec building:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 03:44:50PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
agree with packages naming, but what about spec?
indeed you can use -n beanshell in java-beanshell.spec too, so doesnt' really
matter, but benefit is that you could locate better all .spec files related
to Java.
You are right.
Please copy following files in SPECS:
cp beanshell.spec,v java-beanshell.spec,v
cp gnu.getopt.spec,v java-gnu-getopt.spec,v
cp gnu.regexp.spec,v java-gnu-regexp.spec,v
cp gnu.trove.spec,v java-gnu-trove.spec,v
cp classpath.spec,v java-gnu-classpath.spec,v
--
.Pozdrawiam,
On Thursday 05 February 2009, Paweł Zuzelski wrote:
Please copy following files in SPECS:
cp beanshell.spec,v java-beanshell.spec,v
cp gnu.getopt.spec,v java-gnu-getopt.spec,v
cp gnu.regexp.spec,v java-gnu-regexp.spec,v
cp gnu.trove.spec,v java-gnu-trove.spec,v
cp classpath.spec,v
