On Thursday 03 of January 2013, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 06:25:13PM +, PLD th-x86_64 builder wrote:
> > pcl.spec (auto/th/pcl-1.6.0-1): FAILED
>
> cc1plus gets killed here.
> This package builds fine on carme (x86_64).
>
> Any ideas? Some resource limit? OOM?
[7443951.84
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 06:25:13PM +, PLD th-x86_64 builder wrote:
> pcl.spec (auto/th/pcl-1.6.0-1): FAILED
cc1plus gets killed here.
This package builds fine on carme (x86_64).
Any ideas? Some resource limit? OOM?
--
Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.pl/
__
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 03.01.2013 12:16, Paweł Sikora wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 of January 2013 11:09:40 arekm wrote:
> >
> >> +%define filterout -fstack-protector
> >> --param=ssp-buffer-size=4
> > i think that '%define _ssp_cflags %{nil}' looks better.
>
On 03.01.2013 12:16, Paweł Sikora wrote:
On Thursday 03 of January 2013 11:09:40 arekm wrote:
+%definefilterout -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4
i think that '%define _ssp_cflags %{nil}' looks better.
i think filterout is better because it's more stright-forw
On Thursday 03 of January 2013 11:09:40 arekm wrote:
> +%define filterout -fstack-protector
> --param=ssp-buffer-size=4
i think that '%define _ssp_cflags %{nil}' looks better.
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-lin