Re: ERRORS: pcl.spec

2013-01-03 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
On Thursday 03 of January 2013, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 06:25:13PM +, PLD th-x86_64 builder wrote: > > pcl.spec (auto/th/pcl-1.6.0-1): FAILED > > cc1plus gets killed here. > This package builds fine on carme (x86_64). > > Any ideas? Some resource limit? OOM? [7443951.84

Re: ERRORS: pcl.spec

2013-01-03 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 06:25:13PM +, PLD th-x86_64 builder wrote: > pcl.spec (auto/th/pcl-1.6.0-1): FAILED cc1plus gets killed here. This package builds fine on carme (x86_64). Any ideas? Some resource limit? OOM? -- Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.pl/ __

Re: [packages/uClibc] - rel 5; turn verbose on; filterout stack protector options (we didn't use that earlier, appared in

2013-01-03 Thread Jan Rękorajski
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On 03.01.2013 12:16, Paweł Sikora wrote: > > On Thursday 03 of January 2013 11:09:40 arekm wrote: > > > >> +%define filterout -fstack-protector > >> --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 > > i think that '%define _ssp_cflags %{nil}' looks better. >

Re: [packages/uClibc] - rel 5; turn verbose on; filterout stack protector options (we didn't use that earlier, appared in

2013-01-03 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On 03.01.2013 12:16, Paweł Sikora wrote: On Thursday 03 of January 2013 11:09:40 arekm wrote: +%definefilterout -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 i think that '%define _ssp_cflags %{nil}' looks better. i think filterout is better because it's more stright-forw

Re: [packages/uClibc] - rel 5; turn verbose on; filterout stack protector options (we didn't use that earlier, appared in

2013-01-03 Thread Paweł Sikora
On Thursday 03 of January 2013 11:09:40 arekm wrote: > +%define filterout -fstack-protector > --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 i think that '%define _ssp_cflags %{nil}' looks better. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-lin