Re: The future of i486 arch in Th

2014-12-15 Thread Grzesiek
W dniu 15.12.2014 o 21:01, Jan Rękorajski pisze: TL;DR Future of i486 is bleak, it's a strong candidate for removal. Proposal: remove i486 from Th. Rationale: It's increasingly more problematic to get everything built on i486, some packages explicitly say no to this arch, some require hacks

Re: The future of i486 arch in Th

2014-12-15 Thread Witold Filipczyk
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 09:01:58PM +0100, Jan Rękorajski wrote: TL;DR Future of i486 is bleak, it's a strong candidate for removal. Proposal: remove i486 from Th. Rationale: It's increasingly more problematic to get everything built on i486, some packages explicitly say no to this arch,

Re: The future of i486 arch in Th

2014-12-15 Thread Jeffrey Johnson
I'm more interested in the lowest common denominator Intel architecture. Specifically: Can RPM assume sse2 instructions and optimize digests/crypto to use sse2? 73 de Jeff On Dec 15, 2014, at 3:01 PM, Jan Rękorajski wrote: TL;DR Future of i486 is bleak, it's a strong candidate for

Re: The future of i486 arch in Th

2014-12-15 Thread Jeffrey Johnson
On Dec 15, 2014, at 3:48 PM, Jan Rękorajski wrote: On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: I'm more interested in the lowest common denominator Intel architecture. Specifically: Can RPM assume sse2 instructions and optimize digests/crypto to use sse2? No 32bit AMD CPU has