Re: Failed delivery of build request

2015-09-01 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
On Tuesday 01 of September 2015, Jan Palus wrote: > Could someone have a look why build request sent on Aug 30 keeps on > failing? One of (unmaintained btw as all postmasters are gone I think) MXes had: rootfs 2.0G 1.9G 0 100% / I've deleted few things to make more space there. --

Re: Failed delivery of build request

2015-09-01 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
this looks like rather one of the builde...@pld-linux.org alias recipients mailbox is full. likely forwarded to google. ps: i wonder is it possible to have forward bounces being discarded, like it was mailinglist not alias? ps2: i have also some 550 issues with g...@pld-linux.org forward, i ma

Failed delivery of build request

2015-09-01 Thread Jan Palus
Could someone have a look why build request sent on Aug 30 keeps on failing? On 01.09.2015 19:18, Mail Delivery Subsystem wrote: > This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification > > THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. > > YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. > > Delivery to the

Re: rpm unwanted autodep

2015-09-01 Thread Jeffrey Johnson
> > so used _noautoreqfiles macro > > https://github.com/pld-linux/fpm/commit/2a24ca30d7e85b0e4d9a8680f634819e097999f7 > > aside, content check here is worse than extension check. > i needed to input 5mb junk beginning of file to prevent file(1) detecting > content as python! > (aside) You j

Re: rpm unwanted autodep

2015-09-01 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On 31.08.2015 01:40, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: On Aug 30, 2015, at 6:36 PM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: On Aug 26, 2015, at 5:03 AM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: On 26.08.2015 11:55, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: hi how to avoid rpm to generate python(abi) dependency on this file i tried to input bunch of junk i