Re: [packages/librsvg] - updated dependencies; librsvg since 2.42 is partially in rust (what with th-x32?)

2019-10-11 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 09:05:10PM +0100, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2019, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 08:20:00PM +0100, qboosh wrote: > > > commit fc65f7f1cf360e29b7e44b9835dece9805ad9dbc > > > Author: Jakub Bogusz > > > Date: Wed Jan 30 20:25:13 2019 +0100 >

Re: [packages/systemd] rel 1

2019-10-11 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
On 11/10/2019 11:53, Tomasz Pala wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 09:11:27 +0200, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: > systemctl preset-all Should we call it in %post like docs say? > > BTW which docs? NEWS: * During package installation (with `ninja install`), we would create

Re: [packages/systemd] rel 1

2019-10-11 Thread Tomasz Pala
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 09:11:27 +0200, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: >>> systemctl preset-all >>> >>> Should we call it in %post like docs say? BTW which docs? >> I think it's too risky since we don't have enough real-life testing. > > So right now we end up with services that are not enabled

Re: [packages/systemd] rel 1

2019-10-11 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
On 11/10/2019 08:10, Tomasz Pala wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 11:34:03 +0200, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: > >> What about >> >> systemctl preset-all >> >> Should we call it in %post like docs say? > > I think it's too risky since we don't have enough real-life testing. > So right now we

Re: [packages/systemd] rel 1

2019-10-11 Thread Tomasz Pala
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 11:34:03 +0200, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: > What about > > systemctl preset-all > > Should we call it in %post like docs say? I think it's too risky since we don't have enough real-life testing. -- Tomasz Pala ___