On 19/02/2019 16:59, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
On 19/02/2019 15:37, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
Adding external libidn2 dependency to glibc was a very bad idea and
should be reverted. glibc must not have any 'heavy' external
dependencies.
That's why it is "Suggests" not "Requires".
it's rpm imp
On 19/02/2019 15:37, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> Adding external libidn2 dependency to glibc was a very bad idea and
> should be reverted. glibc must not have any 'heavy' external
> dependencies.
That's why it is "Suggests" not "Requires".
--
Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.o
On 2/19/19 4:37 PM, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
Adding external libidn2 dependency to glibc was a very bad idea and
should be reverted. glibc must not have any 'heavy' external
dependencies. And libidn2 is not even a single library, as it pulls
libunistring.
perhaps pld should go alpine? use musl a
On 19/02/2019 15.23, glen wrote:
> the behaviour is not identical:
>
> 1. previous code did not hide ldconfig errors
Which should not bother us. Even if ldconfig does not work we need this
installed if we want glibc installed properly
> 2. previous code skipped invocation if /usr/sbin/fix-info-d
On 2/19/19 2:16 PM, jajcus wrote:
-%post
-/sbin/ldconfig
-[ ! -x /usr/sbin/fix-info-dir ] || /usr/sbin/fix-info-dir %{_infodir} >/dev/null
2>&1
+%post -p
+os.execute("/sbin/ldconfig >/dev/null 2>&1")
+os.execute("/usr/sbin/fix-info-dir %{_infodir} >/dev/null 2>&1")
-%postun
-/sbin/ldconf
