Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit

2006-08-27 Thread Tomasz Pala
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:15:22PM +0100, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: apache-base requires the /etc/monit directory thanks to our new favorite rpm feature. What's the correct way to fix this? R: monit is a no-no, Speaking of rpm features: ~: kadu [from Ac] kadu: error while loading shared

Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit

2006-08-27 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 07:05:22PM +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:15:22PM +0100, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: apache-base requires the /etc/monit directory thanks to our new favorite rpm feature. What's the correct way to fix this? R: monit is a no-no, Speaking of rpm

Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit

2006-08-27 Thread Tomasz Pala
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 07:24:13PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote: In case of host: rpm -V bind-libs And similarly for some libraries which kadu is linked to. ~: rpm -Va --nofiles Unsatisfied dependencies for X11-Xnest-6.9.0-2.athlon: X11-common = 1:6.9.0-2, X11-modules = 1:6.9.0-2

[th] apache-base requires /etc/monit

2006-08-23 Thread Radoslaw Zielinski
apache-base requires the /etc/monit directory thanks to our new favorite rpm feature. What's the correct way to fix this? R: monit is a no-no, of course. -- Radosław Zieliński [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpdeldtRyX3W.pgp Description: PGP signature ___

Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit

2006-08-23 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 20:51, havner wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:15:22PM +0100, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: apache-base requires the /etc/monit directory thanks to our new favorite rpm feature. What's the correct way to fix this? R: monit is a no-no, of course. Move it to

Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit

2006-08-23 Thread havner
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:00:51PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Move it to filesystem.spec imo, the same with /etc/logrotate.d (not everyone might want to have it and some core applications provide configs for it) Wouldn't monit-apache subpackage be better? We don't end up with tons

Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit

2006-08-23 Thread Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
havner wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:00:51PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Move it to filesystem.spec imo, the same with /etc/logrotate.d (not everyone might want to have it and some core applications provide configs for it) Wouldn't monit-apache subpackage be better? We

Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit

2006-08-23 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 21:24, havner wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:00:51PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Move it to filesystem.spec imo, the same with /etc/logrotate.d (not everyone might want to have it and some core applications provide configs for it) Wouldn't

Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit

2006-08-23 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 21:51, havner wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:15:22PM +0100, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: apache-base requires the /etc/monit directory thanks to our new favorite rpm feature. What's the correct way to fix this? R: monit is a no-no, of course. Move it to

Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit

2006-08-23 Thread havner
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:31:57PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: The *dir* should be only in monit.spec package while apache config file for monit in monit-apache subpackage. True, sorry for misunderstanding. -- RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org

Re: [th] apache-base requires /etc/monit

2006-08-23 Thread Radoslaw Zielinski
Andrzej Krzysztofowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [23-08-2006 20:28]: havner wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:00:51PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Wouldn't monit-apache subpackage be better? We don't end up with tons of application specific directories in filesystem.spec. I'd prefer more or