On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:15:22PM +0100, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
apache-base requires the /etc/monit directory thanks to our new favorite
rpm feature. What's the correct way to fix this? R: monit is a no-no,
Speaking of rpm features:
~: kadu [from Ac]
kadu: error while loading shared
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 07:05:22PM +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:15:22PM +0100, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
apache-base requires the /etc/monit directory thanks to our new favorite
rpm feature. What's the correct way to fix this? R: monit is a no-no,
Speaking of rpm
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 07:24:13PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
In case of host:
rpm -V bind-libs
And similarly for some libraries which kadu is linked to.
~: rpm -Va --nofiles
Unsatisfied dependencies for X11-Xnest-6.9.0-2.athlon: X11-common = 1:6.9.0-2,
X11-modules = 1:6.9.0-2
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 20:51, havner wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:15:22PM +0100, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
apache-base requires the /etc/monit directory thanks to our new favorite
rpm feature. What's the correct way to fix this? R: monit is a no-no,
of course.
Move it to
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:00:51PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
Move it to filesystem.spec imo, the same with /etc/logrotate.d (not
everyone might want to have it and some core applications provide
configs for it)
Wouldn't monit-apache subpackage be better? We don't end up with tons
havner wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:00:51PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
Move it to filesystem.spec imo, the same with /etc/logrotate.d (not
everyone might want to have it and some core applications provide
configs for it)
Wouldn't monit-apache subpackage be better? We
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 21:24, havner wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:00:51PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
Move it to filesystem.spec imo, the same with /etc/logrotate.d (not
everyone might want to have it and some core applications provide
configs for it)
Wouldn't
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 21:51, havner wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:15:22PM +0100, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
apache-base requires the /etc/monit directory thanks to our new favorite
rpm feature. What's the correct way to fix this? R: monit is a no-no,
of course.
Move it to
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:31:57PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
The *dir* should be only in monit.spec package while apache config file for
monit in monit-apache subpackage.
True, sorry for misunderstanding.
--
RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
Andrzej Krzysztofowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [23-08-2006 20:28]:
havner wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:00:51PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
Wouldn't monit-apache subpackage be better? We don't end up with tons of
application specific directories in filesystem.spec.
I'd prefer more or
10 matches
Mail list logo